Newark Police sued twice in one week over First Amendment issues

Carlos Miller

Using subpoena power that you think would be reserved for criminal investigations, Newark Police obtained the IP address of four police officers who posted anonymous criticisms against the department on a website that discusses local issues and politics, according to the New Jersey Star-Ledger.

Three officers ended up getting fired and a fourth officer, Louis Wohltman, ended up getting suspended for nine months for his comments, even though he was off-duty when he posted the comments, which alleged corruption and inefficiency within the department.

Now Wohltman is suing the Newark Police Department for violating his First Amendment rights and invading his privacy. And the ACLU is backing him in the federal lawsuit.

No word on whether the department’s internal affairs division is looking into the allegations of corruption. Or if they were the ones leading the investigation against the four officers.

The lawsuit comes at the heels of another lawsuit filed last week against the Newark Police Department for arresting a newspaper editor who refused to turn over photographs, which is a clear First Amendment violation.

It also comes at a time when employers throughout the country are increasingly retaliating against employees for expressing their opinions online.

Just last week in two separate incidents in Florida, two men lost lost their jobs in connection with blogs they maintain. It’s gotten to the point where many bloggers insist on remaining anonymous to post their opinions online, which at this point, is still protected under the First Amendment.

But for how long?

The Newark incident marks one of the first times, if not the first time, that an employer used the power of subpoena to track down an employee who was posting anonymous opinions online.

In a related matter, the Miami Police Department suspended officer Geovani Nunez for expressing opinion to a newspaper columnist about what he thought was an unjust arrest.

Apparently, the federal whistleblower law does not apply to police officers.

It is no wonder why so many officers have trouble respecting the First Amendments rights of the citizens they are sworn to protect.

Carlos Miller

Using subpoena power that you think would be reserved for criminal investigations, Newark Police obtained the IP address of four police officers who posted anonymous criticisms against the department on a website that discusses local issues and politics, according to the New Jersey Star-Ledger.

Three officers ended up getting fired and a fourth officer, Louis Wohltman, ended up getting suspended for nine months for his comments, even though he was off-duty when he posted the comments, which alleged corruption and inefficiency within the department.

Now Wohltman is suing the Newark Police Department for violating his First Amendment rights and invading his privacy. And the ACLU is backing him in the federal lawsuit.

No word on whether the department’s internal affairs division is looking into the allegations of corruption. Or if they were the ones leading the investigation against the four officers.

The lawsuit comes at the heels of another lawsuit filed last week against the Newark Police Department for arresting a newspaper editor who refused to turn over photographs, which is a clear First Amendment violation.

It also comes at a time when employers throughout the country are increasingly retaliating against employees for expressing their opinions online.

Just last week in two separate incidents in Florida, two men lost lost their jobs in connection with blogs they maintain. It’s gotten to the point where many bloggers insist on remaining anonymous to post their opinions online, which at this point, is still protected under the First Amendment.

But for how long?

The Newark incident marks one of the first times, if not the first time, that an employer used the power of subpoena to track down an employee who was posting anonymous opinions online.

In a related matter, the Miami Police Department suspended officer Geovani Nunez for expressing opinion to a newspaper columnist about what he thought was an unjust arrest.

Apparently, the federal whistleblower law does not apply to police officers.

It is no wonder why so many officers have trouble respecting the First Amendments rights of the citizens they are sworn to protect.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles