Cell phone records audio of cop killing man

An off-duty transportation cop shot and killed a man he was arguing with last September and now a [__cell phone audio recording__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/?p=273473) of the shooting has emerged.

Darryl Simmons, a sergeant with the Southeast Pennsylvania Transportation Authority police department, has maintained that he shot Joe McNair because he thought he “was reaching for a gun,” according to the [__Philadelphia Daily News.__](http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/20090206_Tape_casts_doubt_on_self-defense_claim.html)

But McNair had no weapon.

> In the profanity-laced recording, McNair can be heard asking Simmons several times: “You jealous of me, man?” and Simmons saying “All I want you to do is keep your dogs down.” The two men exchange more profanities before five shots are heard.
> Then, before Simmons calls medics or police, he can be heard calling his wife: “Hey. I just shot and killed this b—-. I said, ‘I just shot this b—-.’ Yeah, come down to the bottom of the hill. Call 9-1-1.”

McNair had made a phone call prior to the argument, which ended up in the recipient’s voice mailbox, enabling it to record the argument and the shooting. The incident occurred September 17th, 2008 in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.

Although Simmons has not been charged in the shooting, the newly revealed audio raises new questions.

However, Simmons’ lawyer states that it should not be introduced as evidence because it may have violated the state’s illegal wire-tapping law.

Pennsylvania has a “two-party consent” law meaning it is “a crime to intercept or record a telephone call or conversation **unless all parties to the conversation consent,” according to the** [__**Citizen Media Law Project.**__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/pennsylvania-recording-law)

**However, the law does not cover instances where there is no expectation of privacy between the two parties.**

> **The law does not cover oral communications when the speakers do not have an “expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation.” See** [__**18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5702**__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/default.asp?SP=pac-1000 “http://government.westlaw.com/linkedslice/default.asp?SP=pac-1000”) **(link is to the entire code, choose Title 18, Part II, Article F, Chapter 57, Subchapter A, and then the specific provision). Therefore, you may be able to record in-person conversations occurring in a public place without consent. However, you should always get the consent of all parties before recording any conversation that common sense tells you is private.**

**The incident occurred on a public street after both men had stepped out of their cars.**

An off-duty transportation cop shot and killed a man he was arguing with last September and now a [__cell phone audio recording__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/?p=273473) of the shooting has emerged.

Darryl Simmons, a sergeant with the Southeast Pennsylvania Transportation Authority police department, has maintained that he shot Joe McNair because he thought he “was reaching for a gun,” according to the [__Philadelphia Daily News.__](http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/20090206_Tape_casts_doubt_on_self-defense_claim.html)

But McNair had no weapon.

> In the profanity-laced recording, McNair can be heard asking Simmons several times: “You jealous of me, man?” and Simmons saying “All I want you to do is keep your dogs down.” The two men exchange more profanities before five shots are heard.
> Then, before Simmons calls medics or police, he can be heard calling his wife: “Hey. I just shot and killed this b—-. I said, ‘I just shot this b—-.’ Yeah, come down to the bottom of the hill. Call 9-1-1.”

McNair had made a phone call prior to the argument, which ended up in the recipient’s voice mailbox, enabling it to record the argument and the shooting. The incident occurred September 17th, 2008 in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.

Although Simmons has not been charged in the shooting, the newly revealed audio raises new questions.

However, Simmons’ lawyer states that it should not be introduced as evidence because it may have violated the state’s illegal wire-tapping law.

Pennsylvania has a “two-party consent” law meaning it is “a crime to intercept or record a telephone call or conversation **unless all parties to the conversation consent,” according to the** [__**Citizen Media Law Project.**__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/pennsylvania-recording-law)

**However, the law does not cover instances where there is no expectation of privacy between the two parties.**

> **The law does not cover oral communications when the speakers do not have an “expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation.” See** [__**18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5702**__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/default.asp?SP=pac-1000 “http://government.westlaw.com/linkedslice/default.asp?SP=pac-1000”) **(link is to the entire code, choose Title 18, Part II, Article F, Chapter 57, Subchapter A, and then the specific provision). Therefore, you may be able to record in-person conversations occurring in a public place without consent. However, you should always get the consent of all parties before recording any conversation that common sense tells you is private.**

**The incident occurred on a public street after both men had stepped out of their cars.**

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles