State Attorney’s office is claiming that I never filed the transcript

Almost two months after filing the entire transcript of my trial in order to get my appeal reviewed by a panel of three judges, the Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office filed a motion to dismiss my appeal on the grounds that I never filed the transcript.

Dumb asses obviously never checked the court records that would prove that I did file the transcript.

I learned today that I was supposed to send the State Attorney’s Office a notice of filing, which of course, was never mentioned in the Pre Se Appellant Handbook, which is compiled by The Florida Bar.

But I’ve also learned that they should have notified me before filing the motion to dismiss in an attempt to clear up any misunderstandings.

My excuse is that I’m pro se. I didn’t know any better. The extent of my law training were the countless hours I spent in the University of Law library preparing my appeal.

What’s their excuse?

That they are just trying to take advantage of a pro se appellant?

Well that much is obvious. All one has to do is take a look at the State Attorney’s response to my original brief to see that they were unable to argue the merit of my argument, so they decided to focus on the fact that I did not follow proper legal procedure (filing the entire transcript), which I ended up doing because the law gives me 30 days to do so (which was enacted to protect pro se appellants).

Now I have to file an opposition to their motion by Monday in order to get it on the record that I did file the transcript, even though it should already be on the record.

After all, wouldn’t the court have already dismissed my appeal?

It took the court less than two weeks after the first time I filed my appeal to inform me that I needed to file the entire transcript. So I would think it would have taken them that long to inform me that my appeal had been dismissed had I not filed the transcript.

Almost two months after filing the entire transcript of my trial in order to get my appeal reviewed by a panel of three judges, the Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office filed a motion to dismiss my appeal on the grounds that I never filed the transcript.

Dumb asses obviously never checked the court records that would prove that I did file the transcript.

I learned today that I was supposed to send the State Attorney’s Office a notice of filing, which of course, was never mentioned in the Pre Se Appellant Handbook, which is compiled by The Florida Bar.

But I’ve also learned that they should have notified me before filing the motion to dismiss in an attempt to clear up any misunderstandings.

My excuse is that I’m pro se. I didn’t know any better. The extent of my law training were the countless hours I spent in the University of Law library preparing my appeal.

What’s their excuse?

That they are just trying to take advantage of a pro se appellant?

Well that much is obvious. All one has to do is take a look at the State Attorney’s response to my original brief to see that they were unable to argue the merit of my argument, so they decided to focus on the fact that I did not follow proper legal procedure (filing the entire transcript), which I ended up doing because the law gives me 30 days to do so (which was enacted to protect pro se appellants).

Now I have to file an opposition to their motion by Monday in order to get it on the record that I did file the transcript, even though it should already be on the record.

After all, wouldn’t the court have already dismissed my appeal?

It took the court less than two weeks after the first time I filed my appeal to inform me that I needed to file the entire transcript. So I would think it would have taken them that long to inform me that my appeal had been dismissed had I not filed the transcript.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles