Man arrested for videotaping on federal property

In a typical show of lies and intimidation, federal officers arrested Antonio Musumeci for videotaping in front of a federal courthouse in Manhattan last November.

Now the 29-year-old man is suing the Department of Homeland Security for false arrest.

Considering he was able to videotape the arrest with a pinhole spy camera – after they confiscated his main camera – he has a strong chance of winning because it shows he was not breaking the law when he was arrested.

He describes the arrest on his blog, [__Blog of Bile.__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/arrested-for-filming-the-arrest-of-julian-heicklen-on-federal-property) The video, which is posted above, was shot with what he calls a [__“gumshoe cam.”__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/gumstick-camera)

It shows how he was videotaping the arrest of activist Julian Heicklen, whom I wrote about recently in the [__Philadelphia incident,__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/if-you-get-too-close-to-me-with-that-camera-ill-take-it-out-of-your-hand-and-ram-it-down-your-throat1)when a pair of Federal Protective Service officers turned on him.

First they told him that he was not allowed to videotape on federal property.

Then, when he refused to identify himself, they said that he is legally required to do so because he was on federal property.

In other words, the Constitution does not apply on federal property.

He was arrested for supposedly violating the following [__federal law__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=31e754bc23c96889047f6b3494e87a54&rgn=div5&view=text&node=41:3.1.1.3.22&idno=41#41:3.1.1.3.22.3.335.12).

> *Code of Federal Regulations*
> *Title 41*
> *Subpart C — Conduct on Federal Property*
> *Photographs for News, Advertising or Commercial Purposes*
> *§ 102-74.420 What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?*
> *Except where security regulations, rules, orders, or directives apply or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it, persons entering in or on Federal property may take photographs of–*
> *(a) Space occupied by a tenant agency for non-commercial purposes only with the permission of the occupying agency concerned;*
> *(b) Space occupied by a tenant agency for commercial purposes only with written permission of an authorized official of the occupying agency concerned; and*
> *(c) Building entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums for news purposes.*
>

The officers were trying to convince him that because he was shooting for an independent news site, [__Free Talk Live,__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/freetalklive.com) that he was shooting for “commercial purposes” and therefore needed to have written permission.

Clearly, they don’t understand the difference between “editorial” and “commercial.” The law even states that photography is permitted  in “building entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums for news purposes.”

In fact, the charges against him were eventually dropped. However, the feds have yet to return his memory card to him.

It must kill them to learn that he still managed to get a video of the arrest online. I really need to get me one of those spy cameras.

The New York Civil Liberties Union [__filed the lawsuit__](http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h2k9cheuKp1Efea7vaU1djmQEREgD9F8CQAO0) on his behalf on Thursday.

In a typical show of lies and intimidation, federal officers arrested Antonio Musumeci for videotaping in front of a federal courthouse in Manhattan last November.

Now the 29-year-old man is suing the Department of Homeland Security for false arrest.

Considering he was able to videotape the arrest with a pinhole spy camera – after they confiscated his main camera – he has a strong chance of winning because it shows he was not breaking the law when he was arrested.

He describes the arrest on his blog, [__Blog of Bile.__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/arrested-for-filming-the-arrest-of-julian-heicklen-on-federal-property) The video, which is posted above, was shot with what he calls a [__“gumshoe cam.”__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/gumstick-camera)

It shows how he was videotaping the arrest of activist Julian Heicklen, whom I wrote about recently in the [__Philadelphia incident,__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/if-you-get-too-close-to-me-with-that-camera-ill-take-it-out-of-your-hand-and-ram-it-down-your-throat1)when a pair of Federal Protective Service officers turned on him.

First they told him that he was not allowed to videotape on federal property.

Then, when he refused to identify himself, they said that he is legally required to do so because he was on federal property.

In other words, the Constitution does not apply on federal property.

He was arrested for supposedly violating the following [__federal law__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=31e754bc23c96889047f6b3494e87a54&rgn=div5&view=text&node=41:3.1.1.3.22&idno=41#41:3.1.1.3.22.3.335.12).

> *Code of Federal Regulations*
> *Title 41*
> *Subpart C — Conduct on Federal Property*
> *Photographs for News, Advertising or Commercial Purposes*
> *§ 102-74.420 What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?*
> *Except where security regulations, rules, orders, or directives apply or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it, persons entering in or on Federal property may take photographs of–*
> *(a) Space occupied by a tenant agency for non-commercial purposes only with the permission of the occupying agency concerned;*
> *(b) Space occupied by a tenant agency for commercial purposes only with written permission of an authorized official of the occupying agency concerned; and*
> *(c) Building entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums for news purposes.*
>

The officers were trying to convince him that because he was shooting for an independent news site, [__Free Talk Live,__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/freetalklive.com) that he was shooting for “commercial purposes” and therefore needed to have written permission.

Clearly, they don’t understand the difference between “editorial” and “commercial.” The law even states that photography is permitted  in “building entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums for news purposes.”

In fact, the charges against him were eventually dropped. However, the feds have yet to return his memory card to him.

It must kill them to learn that he still managed to get a video of the arrest online. I really need to get me one of those spy cameras.

The New York Civil Liberties Union [__filed the lawsuit__](http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h2k9cheuKp1Efea7vaU1djmQEREgD9F8CQAO0) on his behalf on Thursday.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles