Copwatcher Founder Convicted For Resisting Arrest

John Kurtz, the Orlando Copwatch founder who was facing [__six years__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/orlando-copwatch-member-facing-6-years-in-prison) in prison for battery on a law enforcement officer, was acquitted of that felony charge last week.

But he was convicted of resisting arrest without violence – even though the officer testified he was not resisting – proving once again that Florida has an unethical and unconstitutional habit of dishing out resisting arrest convictions without underlying charges to justify the arrest in the first place.

And I’m still not clear on what the judge stated about Kurtz’s missing video camera, the one that was confiscated from him, never to be seen again, which would have proved he never physically pushed the cop. Nobody who attended the trial has been able to explain that to me (and yes, I’ve been asking).

In fact, it was surveillance footage from a security street camera shown in court that showed jurors Kurtz did not attack Orlando Police Officer Adam Gruler.

But despite all that, Judge Alan Apte still sentenced Kurtz to 30 days in jail along with one year probation, indicating that he didn’t seem to keen on upholding any shred of legal objectiveness in the courtroom.

According to [__Orlando Copwatch__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/for-immediate-release-kurtz-seeks-appeal-on-misdemeanor-convictions):

> Kurtz sights that the prosecution during closing arguments and judge during sentencing, say that when Kurtz approached the scene with his camera and told the officers “calm down, I am filming you” that act by itself was interfering , obstructing or opposing a police officer, and thus, the form of resisting arrest without violence. Kurtz insists that this form of free speech is absolutely protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as well as Article I, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution. This is specifically upheld by the US Supreme Court in case Houston vs. Hill, 1987, and Florida Supreme Court Case, Florida vs. Saunders, 1976, as well as other case law. These rulings have never been overturned.

Kurtz’s trial is an extreme version of my trial stemming from my first arrest for photographing cops in Miami.

I was acquitted of disorderly conduct and refusing a lawful order but I was also convicted for resisting arrest without violence.

Judge Jose Fernandez, a former police union attorney, [__sentenced me__](http://www.pixiq.com/article/its-finally-over-or-is-it) to a year probation as well as anger management classes. He had also allowed improper evidence into the trial despite my attorney’s objections.

Just to put these sentences into perspective, a Chicago judge sentenced a cop to [__two years probation__](http://archive.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/06/cop-to-be-sentenced-for-beating-bartender.html) and no jail time for beating up a female bartender and a male patron in a bar, both incidents which were caught on video. There are many more examples of cops receiving lighter sentences after being convicted for violent crimes.

Kurtz’s probation will require him to stay 100 feet away from all police officers, which means he won’t be able to participate in Copwatch for that period.

I served my entire probation, during which I was [__arrested a second time__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/reporter-arrested) for taking photos of cops, which could have landed me in jail for a year on a probation violation.

But I eventually [__reversed the resisting arrest conviction__](http://www.pixiq.com/article/i-won-my-appeal) in an appeal I prepared myself because I was unable to afford the $10,000 for an appeal lawyer (at the time, I didn’t have nearly the readership I have now, so a donation drive would have been futile and I was already in debt for having fought the case to begin with).

In my appeal, I proved Judge Fernandez allowed improper evidence to be introduced when he allowed the prosecutor to use my blog against me and paint me as a cop-hater, which is how I got myself arrested (I didn’t launch it until after my arrest so it had no relevance on the arrest).

So that nullified the probation violation.

I also proved that Fernandez violated my Constitutional rights by issuing me a harsher sentence than sought by the state on the basis that he was upset that I had maintained my innocence throughout the trial.

Kurtz states on Orlando Copwatch that Judge Apte seemed to take a disliking to him, which was one reason he handed him a harsh sentence.

> “Dozens if not hundreds of people go through the Orange County Courthouse everyday with charges of and similar to resisting arrest without violence, these people get nothing more than ‘a slap on the wrist’” Kurtz said.
> “In the multiple plea deals I was offered, jail time was never mentioned, in fact my last plea offer didn’t even include probabtion and this is when I was charged with a felony, as well as resisting arrest without violence. Now that I have been found not guilty of a felony and all I have is this little misdemeanor, which is the first charge of my life, Judge Apte stuck me in jail for 30 days and a year probation. Judge Apte made it clear that he was annoyed that I wasted the courts time by excercising my right to trial instead of accepting the plea offers and he wants to punish me for it. It is that simple”.

After I had won my appeal, the cop who arrested me in the second incident, Miami Beach Police Officer David Socarra (pictured above), never showed up to court on two seperate trial dates, which lead to that single charge of resisting arrest without violence to be dismissed.

Kurtz is also planning to appeal his resisting arrest conviction and should have a good chance of winning.

He is asking for donations to hire a lawyer, which he estimates will cost between $10,000 to $15,000.

I recommend Kurtz [__read through this article__](http://www.pixiq.com/article/the-moment-of-judgment-has-arrived) where he will find my appeal brief, the state’s answer brief and my reply brief, which might help him and/or his attorneys in preparing a successful appeal.

John Kurtz, the Orlando Copwatch founder who was facing [__six years__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/orlando-copwatch-member-facing-6-years-in-prison) in prison for battery on a law enforcement officer, was acquitted of that felony charge last week.

But he was convicted of resisting arrest without violence – even though the officer testified he was not resisting – proving once again that Florida has an unethical and unconstitutional habit of dishing out resisting arrest convictions without underlying charges to justify the arrest in the first place.

And I’m still not clear on what the judge stated about Kurtz’s missing video camera, the one that was confiscated from him, never to be seen again, which would have proved he never physically pushed the cop. Nobody who attended the trial has been able to explain that to me (and yes, I’ve been asking).

In fact, it was surveillance footage from a security street camera shown in court that showed jurors Kurtz did not attack Orlando Police Officer Adam Gruler.

But despite all that, Judge Alan Apte still sentenced Kurtz to 30 days in jail along with one year probation, indicating that he didn’t seem to keen on upholding any shred of legal objectiveness in the courtroom.

According to [__Orlando Copwatch__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/for-immediate-release-kurtz-seeks-appeal-on-misdemeanor-convictions):

> Kurtz sights that the prosecution during closing arguments and judge during sentencing, say that when Kurtz approached the scene with his camera and told the officers “calm down, I am filming you” that act by itself was interfering , obstructing or opposing a police officer, and thus, the form of resisting arrest without violence. Kurtz insists that this form of free speech is absolutely protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as well as Article I, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution. This is specifically upheld by the US Supreme Court in case Houston vs. Hill, 1987, and Florida Supreme Court Case, Florida vs. Saunders, 1976, as well as other case law. These rulings have never been overturned.

Kurtz’s trial is an extreme version of my trial stemming from my first arrest for photographing cops in Miami.

I was acquitted of disorderly conduct and refusing a lawful order but I was also convicted for resisting arrest without violence.

Judge Jose Fernandez, a former police union attorney, [__sentenced me__](http://www.pixiq.com/article/its-finally-over-or-is-it) to a year probation as well as anger management classes. He had also allowed improper evidence into the trial despite my attorney’s objections.

Just to put these sentences into perspective, a Chicago judge sentenced a cop to [__two years probation__](http://archive.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/06/cop-to-be-sentenced-for-beating-bartender.html) and no jail time for beating up a female bartender and a male patron in a bar, both incidents which were caught on video. There are many more examples of cops receiving lighter sentences after being convicted for violent crimes.

Kurtz’s probation will require him to stay 100 feet away from all police officers, which means he won’t be able to participate in Copwatch for that period.

I served my entire probation, during which I was [__arrested a second time__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/reporter-arrested) for taking photos of cops, which could have landed me in jail for a year on a probation violation.

But I eventually [__reversed the resisting arrest conviction__](http://www.pixiq.com/article/i-won-my-appeal) in an appeal I prepared myself because I was unable to afford the $10,000 for an appeal lawyer (at the time, I didn’t have nearly the readership I have now, so a donation drive would have been futile and I was already in debt for having fought the case to begin with).

In my appeal, I proved Judge Fernandez allowed improper evidence to be introduced when he allowed the prosecutor to use my blog against me and paint me as a cop-hater, which is how I got myself arrested (I didn’t launch it until after my arrest so it had no relevance on the arrest).

So that nullified the probation violation.

I also proved that Fernandez violated my Constitutional rights by issuing me a harsher sentence than sought by the state on the basis that he was upset that I had maintained my innocence throughout the trial.

Kurtz states on Orlando Copwatch that Judge Apte seemed to take a disliking to him, which was one reason he handed him a harsh sentence.

> “Dozens if not hundreds of people go through the Orange County Courthouse everyday with charges of and similar to resisting arrest without violence, these people get nothing more than ‘a slap on the wrist’” Kurtz said.
> “In the multiple plea deals I was offered, jail time was never mentioned, in fact my last plea offer didn’t even include probabtion and this is when I was charged with a felony, as well as resisting arrest without violence. Now that I have been found not guilty of a felony and all I have is this little misdemeanor, which is the first charge of my life, Judge Apte stuck me in jail for 30 days and a year probation. Judge Apte made it clear that he was annoyed that I wasted the courts time by excercising my right to trial instead of accepting the plea offers and he wants to punish me for it. It is that simple”.

After I had won my appeal, the cop who arrested me in the second incident, Miami Beach Police Officer David Socarra (pictured above), never showed up to court on two seperate trial dates, which lead to that single charge of resisting arrest without violence to be dismissed.

Kurtz is also planning to appeal his resisting arrest conviction and should have a good chance of winning.

He is asking for donations to hire a lawyer, which he estimates will cost between $10,000 to $15,000.

I recommend Kurtz [__read through this article__](http://www.pixiq.com/article/the-moment-of-judgment-has-arrived) where he will find my appeal brief, the state’s answer brief and my reply brief, which might help him and/or his attorneys in preparing a successful appeal.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles