Former WV Senator Ordered To Delete Photos In Pittsburgh Mall

Cindy Frich, a former member of the West Virginia House of Delegates, was in a joyful mood as she shopped for Christmas presents in a Pittsburgh shopping mall recently.

But that was before the former republican state senator was accosted by an angry mother who was upset that Frinch had snapped a photo of her child sitting on Santa’s lap.

Seconds later, a security guard confronted her, ordering her to delete the photos.

This is how she explained it in a column in the [__Pittsburgh Post-Gazette:__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/1196417-109-0.stm)

> Feeling in the Christmas mood, when I encountered Santa at South Hills Village my smart phone photo application came in handy to capture the scene. But the picture seemed incomplete because there were no children sitting on Santa’s knee, confiding in him their sugar-plum visions.
> Happily, a family approached unceremoniously through the exit of the elaborate display and soon their child was comfortably perched on Santa’s knee. My vignette was complete as I quickly snapped three photos while other families lined up at the entrance.
> Full of Christmas warmth, I continued visiting shops until a woman interrupted my transaction and verbally assaulted me for photographing her son. She wanted to know what kind of person would take a picture of someone else’s child. After her public assault, it was difficult to remember the Christmas spirit the picture had engendered.
> A South Hills Village security guard told me to delete the photos from my cell phone. After informing the guard that there were also photographs of Santa without the child, the guard told me that it was against mall policy to take photos in the mall.

As she walked away with her photos deleted, she remembered a man in the child’s group had also taken photos, so she walked back to ask the guard if he had been ordered to delete his images.

> Returning to find the security guard still with the alleged mother and her group of four adults, I attempted to clarify the mall’s camera rule. When I asked if the family would have to delete mall photos from their phones, too, the guard unprofessionally joined the family in laughing at my logical query.
> The woman who had stalked me through the mall did not know that I am a former state legislator who initiated and succeeded in creating strict laws against pedophiles in the West Virginia legislature. To me, the random child in my picture was simply a representation of a special moment in a human life and an innocent attempt to capture the magic of Christmas.

But the mother obviously felt more comfortable with her child sitting on the lap of a male stranger than getting photographed by a female stranger.

It’s unfortunate that a former legislator did not have enough sense to know that a private security guard – nor a cop for that matter – does not have the authority to force you to delete your images.

And neither does a paranoid mother.

If there is indeed a policy against photography in the mall, then all they could have done was ask her to leave, then have her arrested for trespassing if she refused.

Cindy Frich, a former member of the West Virginia House of Delegates, was in a joyful mood as she shopped for Christmas presents in a Pittsburgh shopping mall recently.

But that was before the former republican state senator was accosted by an angry mother who was upset that Frinch had snapped a photo of her child sitting on Santa’s lap.

Seconds later, a security guard confronted her, ordering her to delete the photos.

This is how she explained it in a column in the [__Pittsburgh Post-Gazette:__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/1196417-109-0.stm)

> Feeling in the Christmas mood, when I encountered Santa at South Hills Village my smart phone photo application came in handy to capture the scene. But the picture seemed incomplete because there were no children sitting on Santa’s knee, confiding in him their sugar-plum visions.
> Happily, a family approached unceremoniously through the exit of the elaborate display and soon their child was comfortably perched on Santa’s knee. My vignette was complete as I quickly snapped three photos while other families lined up at the entrance.
> Full of Christmas warmth, I continued visiting shops until a woman interrupted my transaction and verbally assaulted me for photographing her son. She wanted to know what kind of person would take a picture of someone else’s child. After her public assault, it was difficult to remember the Christmas spirit the picture had engendered.
> A South Hills Village security guard told me to delete the photos from my cell phone. After informing the guard that there were also photographs of Santa without the child, the guard told me that it was against mall policy to take photos in the mall.

As she walked away with her photos deleted, she remembered a man in the child’s group had also taken photos, so she walked back to ask the guard if he had been ordered to delete his images.

> Returning to find the security guard still with the alleged mother and her group of four adults, I attempted to clarify the mall’s camera rule. When I asked if the family would have to delete mall photos from their phones, too, the guard unprofessionally joined the family in laughing at my logical query.
> The woman who had stalked me through the mall did not know that I am a former state legislator who initiated and succeeded in creating strict laws against pedophiles in the West Virginia legislature. To me, the random child in my picture was simply a representation of a special moment in a human life and an innocent attempt to capture the magic of Christmas.

But the mother obviously felt more comfortable with her child sitting on the lap of a male stranger than getting photographed by a female stranger.

It’s unfortunate that a former legislator did not have enough sense to know that a private security guard – nor a cop for that matter – does not have the authority to force you to delete your images.

And neither does a paranoid mother.

If there is indeed a policy against photography in the mall, then all they could have done was ask her to leave, then have her arrested for trespassing if she refused.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles