L.A. Drone Activist Jailed Four Days After Refusing Deal

Daniel Saulmon, Southern Californian’s [__notorious video activist__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/06/11/pinac-reader-test-drives-aerial-drone-dui-checkpoint/), spent four days in a crowded county jail this week after refusing a plea deal that would have forbade him from flying his quadcopter for two years within Los Angeles County.

“It was terrible,” said the man known as Tom Zebra on Youtube of his experience in the Twin Towers Correctional Facility in Los Angeles in a telephone interview with *Photography is Not a Crime* hours after his release.

“I watched deputies nearly beat a guy to death with batons and tasers. I saw another man go into a seizure and almost die. It was not good.”

Saulmon’s ordeal stems from [__an incident last month__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/08/07/california-cops-confiscate-quadcopter/) in which he was flying his DJI Phantom over the Port of Los Angeles during an event called Navy Days, which  was supposedly a photo-friendly day open to the public; encouraging residents to bring their cameras and step aboard the USS Anchorage.

He and a friend remained in a public parking lot flying the drone when they were approached by Los Angeles Port police officers, who confiscated the quadcopter under a little-known park regulation that applies to ports, [__LAMC 63.44 (b) (8),__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/lamc63.pdf) which states:

> Within the limits of any park or other City-owned Harbor Department designated and controlled property within the City of Los Angeles: No person shall land, release, take off or fly any balloon, except children toy balloons not inflated with any flammable material, helicopter, parakite, hang glider, aircraft or powered models thereof, except in areas specifically set aside therefor.

Saulmon removed his memory card before handing over his drone, figuring he would eventually get it back.

He was wrong.

The prosecutor, whose name we are still trying to obtain, told him that under no circumstances would they be returning his drone.

He believes it is retaliation for having flown his quadcopter over the Hollywood Police Department as well as over a [__DUI checkpoint__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/06/11/pinac-reader-test-drives-aerial-drone-dui-checkpoint/) over the summer.

“When they took my drone, they kept questioning why I was flying my drone over the Hollywood station,” he said. “The video ended up on TMZ, but it’s not illegal to take pictures of a police station.”

The prosecutor asked that he be jailed for 30 days instead of released upon his own recognizance because he claimed Saulmon had a history of not showing up to court, even though Saulmon said he showed up to court dates on four previous occasions for this case, only to be told it had not been filed or it had been continued.

He was bailed out with $2,400 after his friends raised the money through the internet.

Another citizen, Carey Fujita, who has been flying quadcopters for a year, posting videos on his website called [__Rise of the Drones__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/www.riseofthedrones.net), also had his drone confiscated during the Navy Days events the day after Saulmon’s drone was confiscated.

Unlike Saulmon, who runs a website called [__Mistaken Bacon__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/www.mistakenbacon.com), where he makes a habit of recording cops in public, frequently getting arrested for it, Fujita enjoys flying his quadcopters over empty spaces and tries to avoid interacting with police.

He was offered the same deal as Saulmon, but accepted it, losing his drone and his right to fly drones in Los Angeles County for two years.

“Had I known there was a municipal code about flying drones near the port, I would not have done it,” Sualmon said in a telephone interview.

“I had been flying down there for a year and nobody ever said anything to me except one time when a port police officer asked me not to fly too close to the ships.”

He said he purposely chose the port because it enabled him to fly over areas where crowds do not converge; an attempt to comply with [__Federal Aviation Administration guidelines.__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/ac91-57.pdf)

“Some parks have signs that say model aircrafts are not allowed,” he said. “But there are no signs at the port.”

Fujita, who attended his hearing three days after Saulmon was jailed, said the prosecutor bragged about having jailed Saulmon.

“He was kind of arrogant about it,” Fujita said. “He didn’t have to  go there with that.”

The prosecutor also told him he would be handling all drone cases in the future, obviously in an attempt to ensure nobody flies them over the City of Angels.

However, it was only this week that the [__FAA gave clearance__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/faa-approval-drones-hollywood) to commercial film crews, most which are concentrated in Los Angeles, to fly drones.

Check out the three videos for more information on his case.

Daniel Saulmon, Southern Californian’s [__notorious video activist__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/06/11/pinac-reader-test-drives-aerial-drone-dui-checkpoint/), spent four days in a crowded county jail this week after refusing a plea deal that would have forbade him from flying his quadcopter for two years within Los Angeles County.

“It was terrible,” said the man known as Tom Zebra on Youtube of his experience in the Twin Towers Correctional Facility in Los Angeles in a telephone interview with *Photography is Not a Crime* hours after his release.

“I watched deputies nearly beat a guy to death with batons and tasers. I saw another man go into a seizure and almost die. It was not good.”

Saulmon’s ordeal stems from [__an incident last month__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/08/07/california-cops-confiscate-quadcopter/) in which he was flying his DJI Phantom over the Port of Los Angeles during an event called Navy Days, which  was supposedly a photo-friendly day open to the public; encouraging residents to bring their cameras and step aboard the USS Anchorage.

He and a friend remained in a public parking lot flying the drone when they were approached by Los Angeles Port police officers, who confiscated the quadcopter under a little-known park regulation that applies to ports, [__LAMC 63.44 (b) (8),__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/lamc63.pdf) which states:

> Within the limits of any park or other City-owned Harbor Department designated and controlled property within the City of Los Angeles: No person shall land, release, take off or fly any balloon, except children toy balloons not inflated with any flammable material, helicopter, parakite, hang glider, aircraft or powered models thereof, except in areas specifically set aside therefor.

Saulmon removed his memory card before handing over his drone, figuring he would eventually get it back.

He was wrong.

The prosecutor, whose name we are still trying to obtain, told him that under no circumstances would they be returning his drone.

He believes it is retaliation for having flown his quadcopter over the Hollywood Police Department as well as over a [__DUI checkpoint__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/06/11/pinac-reader-test-drives-aerial-drone-dui-checkpoint/) over the summer.

“When they took my drone, they kept questioning why I was flying my drone over the Hollywood station,” he said. “The video ended up on TMZ, but it’s not illegal to take pictures of a police station.”

The prosecutor asked that he be jailed for 30 days instead of released upon his own recognizance because he claimed Saulmon had a history of not showing up to court, even though Saulmon said he showed up to court dates on four previous occasions for this case, only to be told it had not been filed or it had been continued.

He was bailed out with $2,400 after his friends raised the money through the internet.

Another citizen, Carey Fujita, who has been flying quadcopters for a year, posting videos on his website called [__Rise of the Drones__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/www.riseofthedrones.net), also had his drone confiscated during the Navy Days events the day after Saulmon’s drone was confiscated.

Unlike Saulmon, who runs a website called [__Mistaken Bacon__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/www.mistakenbacon.com), where he makes a habit of recording cops in public, frequently getting arrested for it, Fujita enjoys flying his quadcopters over empty spaces and tries to avoid interacting with police.

He was offered the same deal as Saulmon, but accepted it, losing his drone and his right to fly drones in Los Angeles County for two years.

“Had I known there was a municipal code about flying drones near the port, I would not have done it,” Sualmon said in a telephone interview.

“I had been flying down there for a year and nobody ever said anything to me except one time when a port police officer asked me not to fly too close to the ships.”

He said he purposely chose the port because it enabled him to fly over areas where crowds do not converge; an attempt to comply with [__Federal Aviation Administration guidelines.__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/ac91-57.pdf)

“Some parks have signs that say model aircrafts are not allowed,” he said. “But there are no signs at the port.”

Fujita, who attended his hearing three days after Saulmon was jailed, said the prosecutor bragged about having jailed Saulmon.

“He was kind of arrogant about it,” Fujita said. “He didn’t have to  go there with that.”

The prosecutor also told him he would be handling all drone cases in the future, obviously in an attempt to ensure nobody flies them over the City of Angels.

However, it was only this week that the [__FAA gave clearance__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/faa-approval-drones-hollywood) to commercial film crews, most which are concentrated in Los Angeles, to fly drones.

Check out the three videos for more information on his case.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles