Texas Cop Loses Job for Chokehold on Woman,

The video that went viral after it was [**posted on PINAC Monday**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/11/texas-cops-place-woman-chokehold-video-recording/), showing a woman being placed in a chokehold after she refused to provide identification, led to the resignation of one officer and disciplinary action against another after a dash cam video obtained through a PINAC public records request ended up contradicting an earlier statement from the police chief.

The day the initial video was posted, Corpus Christi Police Chief Floyd D. Simpson issued a press release in which he said Lanessa Espinosa was involved in a fight with a large group of people, which is why the officers had probable cause to demand her identification.

Simpson also stated the following:

> The Corpus Christi Police Department prides itself in transparency and respects the public’s right to photograph and record in public. Our officers are trained to be respectful during police/citizen contacts and de-escalation techniques.
> Furthermore, members of the Corpus Christi Police Department do not interfere with citizens who wish to photograph or record our officers in the public space.

But then the dash cam footage requested by PINAC’s growing research team revealed that Corpus Christi Police Sergeant Jerry Lockhart ordered her to delete the footage she had recorded of him placing her in handcuffs after a Nueces County district attorney officer placed her in a chokehold.

It also shows she was not part of the fight because they had that group lined up against a van away from Espinosa.

Nueces County district attorney officer Gary Witherspoon [**ended up resigning**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/20141203-investigator-resigns-after-putting-woman-in-chokehold-officer-who-wanted-video-deleted-is-disciplined.ece) to avoid termination because of that chokehold.

And Lockhart was “formally disciplined” for ordering her to delete the footage, although Simpson did not specify exactly how he would be disciplined.

![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/maven-user-photos/pinacnews/police-brutality/LhlGTxQVnU-jb5b_cF6-uA/4RU37sFEn0CUcltQXfU4fA)

Simpson followed up his first statement with the following statement after the truth emerged:

> Based on the news stories aired locally and on the internet, it was brought to our attention that an Officer had requested Ms. Espinosa to delete the video that was recorded. We viewed the entire dash cam video and found the conversation between Officer Lockhart and Ms. Espinosa. It was discovered that Officer Lockhart did request that the video be deleted.
> Officer Lockhart took full responsibility for his statement on the video and was formally disciplined for those actions.
> A memo, to the entire department, will follow on Wednesday regarding Texas Penal Code Sec. 38.02 “Failure to Identify” and our commitment to transparency by allowing citizens who wish to photograph or record our officers in a public space.

[**KIII-TV,**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ccpd-officer-disciplined-for-asking-woman-to-delete-video) which reported on the story this week, [**mistakenly claiming**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/12/texas-tv-news-station-spreading-misinformation/) that citizens are required by law to provide identification to cops, even if they have not been lawfully arrested, clarified that mistake in the following statements.

> It shows a local woman, Lanessa Espinosa, as she repeatedly refuses to show law officers her I.D. She was seen arguing correctly that unless they planned to arrest her, she could legally refuse.

So perhaps Simpson had been misled by his own officers when he issued the first press release, but he followed through on his promise of transparency in his second press release as soon as he learned the truth.

The video below combines Espinosa’s video footage from Lockhart’s dash cam video. The incident took place in August but Espinosa didn’t publish it until last weekend because she was afraid of retaliation. She has since retained an attorney.

The video that went viral after it was [**posted on PINAC Monday**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/11/texas-cops-place-woman-chokehold-video-recording/), showing a woman being placed in a chokehold after she refused to provide identification, led to the resignation of one officer and disciplinary action against another after a dash cam video obtained through a PINAC public records request ended up contradicting an earlier statement from the police chief.

The day the initial video was posted, Corpus Christi Police Chief Floyd D. Simpson issued a press release in which he said Lanessa Espinosa was involved in a fight with a large group of people, which is why the officers had probable cause to demand her identification.

Simpson also stated the following:

> The Corpus Christi Police Department prides itself in transparency and respects the public’s right to photograph and record in public. Our officers are trained to be respectful during police/citizen contacts and de-escalation techniques.
> Furthermore, members of the Corpus Christi Police Department do not interfere with citizens who wish to photograph or record our officers in the public space.

But then the dash cam footage requested by PINAC’s growing research team revealed that Corpus Christi Police Sergeant Jerry Lockhart ordered her to delete the footage she had recorded of him placing her in handcuffs after a Nueces County district attorney officer placed her in a chokehold.

It also shows she was not part of the fight because they had that group lined up against a van away from Espinosa.

Nueces County district attorney officer Gary Witherspoon [**ended up resigning**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/20141203-investigator-resigns-after-putting-woman-in-chokehold-officer-who-wanted-video-deleted-is-disciplined.ece) to avoid termination because of that chokehold.

And Lockhart was “formally disciplined” for ordering her to delete the footage, although Simpson did not specify exactly how he would be disciplined.

![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/maven-user-photos/pinacnews/police-brutality/LhlGTxQVnU-jb5b_cF6-uA/4RU37sFEn0CUcltQXfU4fA)

Simpson followed up his first statement with the following statement after the truth emerged:

> Based on the news stories aired locally and on the internet, it was brought to our attention that an Officer had requested Ms. Espinosa to delete the video that was recorded. We viewed the entire dash cam video and found the conversation between Officer Lockhart and Ms. Espinosa. It was discovered that Officer Lockhart did request that the video be deleted.
> Officer Lockhart took full responsibility for his statement on the video and was formally disciplined for those actions.
> A memo, to the entire department, will follow on Wednesday regarding Texas Penal Code Sec. 38.02 “Failure to Identify” and our commitment to transparency by allowing citizens who wish to photograph or record our officers in a public space.

[**KIII-TV,**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ccpd-officer-disciplined-for-asking-woman-to-delete-video) which reported on the story this week, [**mistakenly claiming**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/12/texas-tv-news-station-spreading-misinformation/) that citizens are required by law to provide identification to cops, even if they have not been lawfully arrested, clarified that mistake in the following statements.

> It shows a local woman, Lanessa Espinosa, as she repeatedly refuses to show law officers her I.D. She was seen arguing correctly that unless they planned to arrest her, she could legally refuse.

So perhaps Simpson had been misled by his own officers when he issued the first press release, but he followed through on his promise of transparency in his second press release as soon as he learned the truth.

The video below combines Espinosa’s video footage from Lockhart’s dash cam video. The incident took place in August but Espinosa didn’t publish it until last weekend because she was afraid of retaliation. She has since retained an attorney.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles