Boston Police Commissioner Hoping to Criminalize the Recording of Cops

In a [**recent interview with**](http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2015/08/boston_police_commissioner_wants_law_to_push_back_on_camera) [***The Boston Herald***](http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2015/08/boston_police_commissioner_wants_law_to_push_back_on_camera), Boston police Commissioner William Evans whined about people who record the police, even going so far as to call for a new law that would criminalize the act of recording a police officer while standing within a certain distance of them.

“If we can get legislation to make it fair, so it protects both sides, then I’m all for it,” Evans told the *Herald*. “Would I love to see a little distance? I’d love to see that.”

I’m glad Evans finally admits that the public needs legal protection when they record his officers. I’ve needed protection from the Boston police for years as they have threatened me with false arrest, with “physical removal” from public buildings and have shoved me around on many occasions.

But I don’t think that’s what the commissioner meant.

Evans also complained about camera-wielding individuals allegedly getting in police officers’ faces and “taunting” them, mentioning a July 4 incident as one example. Although he didn’t reference me by name, it was clear from the description he provided that [**he was referring to a video I shot.**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/07/boston-police-command-staff-encourages-and-participates-in-misconduct/)

![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/maven-user-photos/pinacnews/public-records/g0QGF3NB00O5NUmXXgwO1g/LWQJtG6JFESxQ4fK8inyBQ)

In that video, I asked Boston police officers, who were not wearing their badges, to comply with [**state laws**](https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleVII/Chapter41/Section98C) about [**identifying themselves**](https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleVII/Chapter41/Section98d). After I began speaking with the officers from a polite distance, Boston police Deputy Superintendent William Ridge got in my face – standing literally inches away from me in an obvious attempt to intimidate – and ordered me to leave the public sidewalk that I was legally standing on.

Regarding that incident, Evans complained: “If the officer had an incident with that person and the person wanted our badge, of course we’re going to give it. But when you’re just out there for the very reason of trying to get a getcha moment, then that’s irritating to us.”

It’s not a “trying to get a getcha moment” when I, or anyone else, decides to record police officers who are actively breaking laws or violating policies. Acting as though police misconduct isn’t real because of the very fact that someone recorded it makes no sense. The fact that Evans is attacking people who record police misconduct instead of trying to address police misconduct shows his real priorities.

On top of that, the law Evans is calling for is clearly unconstitutional.

The [**Glik precedent**](https://www.aclu.org/news/appeals-court-unanimously-affirms-right-videotape-police), which involved a man arrested for recording Boston cops, established years ago that recording the police is protected by the First Amendment (not to mention the more recent [**Gericke decision**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/06/new-hampshire-ruling/)). Evans claims that he’s trying to address the issue of people interfering with police, but if that’s true, there’s no reason to pass a law singling out people who are recording. There are already laws that prohibit interfering with police.

By targeting only those who are recording, it’s clear that Evans wants to criminalize journalistic activity, not interference.

If a law like the one Evans hopes to see passes, it could potentially make it illegal to record police in almost any circumstance. Any time a police officer approached a person, it would be illegal for that person to record the interaction if the cop got close enough to them.

But such a law would probably be struck down by the courts if it was ever passed. Maybe Evans slept through civics class, but passing a law that violates the First Amendment will only lead to lawsuits and wasted taxpayer money.

Furthermore, if any lawmakers are foolish enough to try to pass a law like this, they’ll probably end up withdrawing the bill amid a public outcry like Texas state Representative Jason Villalba, who [**tried to pass a similar buffer zone law**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/04/texas-legislator-drops-bill-that-would-have-made-it-illegal-to-record-cops-as-nation-sees-necessity-to-record-cops/) for people recording cops earlier this year. Here in Massachusetts, state Senator James Eldridge has already [**come out against**](https://twitter.com/JamieEldridgeMA/status/630941503083384832) Evans’ proposal.

But we shouldn’t wait for lawmakers to propose such a law. We should #FireEvans over his contempt for the First Amendment right now.

Phone number for Boston mayor’s office: 617.635.4500

Email address for Boston mayor’s office: mayor@boston.gov.

Or just leave your comments on the Facebook pages of [**Boston Police Department**](https://www.facebook.com/BostonPoliceDepartment?fref=ts) and the [**city of Boston.**](https://www.facebook.com/cityofboston)

In a [**recent interview with**](http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2015/08/boston_police_commissioner_wants_law_to_push_back_on_camera) [***The Boston Herald***](http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2015/08/boston_police_commissioner_wants_law_to_push_back_on_camera), Boston police Commissioner William Evans whined about people who record the police, even going so far as to call for a new law that would criminalize the act of recording a police officer while standing within a certain distance of them.

“If we can get legislation to make it fair, so it protects both sides, then I’m all for it,” Evans told the *Herald*. “Would I love to see a little distance? I’d love to see that.”

I’m glad Evans finally admits that the public needs legal protection when they record his officers. I’ve needed protection from the Boston police for years as they have threatened me with false arrest, with “physical removal” from public buildings and have shoved me around on many occasions.

But I don’t think that’s what the commissioner meant.

Evans also complained about camera-wielding individuals allegedly getting in police officers’ faces and “taunting” them, mentioning a July 4 incident as one example. Although he didn’t reference me by name, it was clear from the description he provided that [**he was referring to a video I shot.**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/07/boston-police-command-staff-encourages-and-participates-in-misconduct/)

![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/maven-user-photos/pinacnews/public-records/g0QGF3NB00O5NUmXXgwO1g/LWQJtG6JFESxQ4fK8inyBQ)

In that video, I asked Boston police officers, who were not wearing their badges, to comply with [**state laws**](https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleVII/Chapter41/Section98C) about [**identifying themselves**](https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleVII/Chapter41/Section98d). After I began speaking with the officers from a polite distance, Boston police Deputy Superintendent William Ridge got in my face – standing literally inches away from me in an obvious attempt to intimidate – and ordered me to leave the public sidewalk that I was legally standing on.

Regarding that incident, Evans complained: “If the officer had an incident with that person and the person wanted our badge, of course we’re going to give it. But when you’re just out there for the very reason of trying to get a getcha moment, then that’s irritating to us.”

It’s not a “trying to get a getcha moment” when I, or anyone else, decides to record police officers who are actively breaking laws or violating policies. Acting as though police misconduct isn’t real because of the very fact that someone recorded it makes no sense. The fact that Evans is attacking people who record police misconduct instead of trying to address police misconduct shows his real priorities.

On top of that, the law Evans is calling for is clearly unconstitutional.

The [**Glik precedent**](https://www.aclu.org/news/appeals-court-unanimously-affirms-right-videotape-police), which involved a man arrested for recording Boston cops, established years ago that recording the police is protected by the First Amendment (not to mention the more recent [**Gericke decision**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/06/new-hampshire-ruling/)). Evans claims that he’s trying to address the issue of people interfering with police, but if that’s true, there’s no reason to pass a law singling out people who are recording. There are already laws that prohibit interfering with police.

By targeting only those who are recording, it’s clear that Evans wants to criminalize journalistic activity, not interference.

If a law like the one Evans hopes to see passes, it could potentially make it illegal to record police in almost any circumstance. Any time a police officer approached a person, it would be illegal for that person to record the interaction if the cop got close enough to them.

But such a law would probably be struck down by the courts if it was ever passed. Maybe Evans slept through civics class, but passing a law that violates the First Amendment will only lead to lawsuits and wasted taxpayer money.

Furthermore, if any lawmakers are foolish enough to try to pass a law like this, they’ll probably end up withdrawing the bill amid a public outcry like Texas state Representative Jason Villalba, who [**tried to pass a similar buffer zone law**](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/04/texas-legislator-drops-bill-that-would-have-made-it-illegal-to-record-cops-as-nation-sees-necessity-to-record-cops/) for people recording cops earlier this year. Here in Massachusetts, state Senator James Eldridge has already [**come out against**](https://twitter.com/JamieEldridgeMA/status/630941503083384832) Evans’ proposal.

But we shouldn’t wait for lawmakers to propose such a law. We should #FireEvans over his contempt for the First Amendment right now.

Phone number for Boston mayor’s office: 617.635.4500

Email address for Boston mayor’s office: mayor@boston.gov.

Or just leave your comments on the Facebook pages of [**Boston Police Department**](https://www.facebook.com/BostonPoliceDepartment?fref=ts) and the [**city of Boston.**](https://www.facebook.com/cityofboston)

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles