Kentucky Judge Dismisses All-White Jury, Citing Unfair Trial

In a judicial system where race is contentious, Judge Olu Stevens sought a mixed-raced jury. Studies [__have shown__](http://www.npr.org/2015/11/02/452898470/supreme-court-takes-on-racial-discrimination-in-jury-selection) that all-white juries have the tendency to convict ethnicities that are not caucasian.

In the Kentucky case with Judge Stevens, the jurors were selected from a pool of 37 white jurors and only three black jurors with two of the black jurors having already been eliminated before the final selection was made.

The Judge was presiding over a drug case last month involving a black defendant in the Jefferson County Circuit Court in Louisville, which has a population of 22 percent black residents.

According to the judge, an all white jury presented an unfair disadvantage for a fair verdict.

“The concern is that the panel is not representative of the community,” said Stevens.

This is the second time Judge Stevens has ordered a new jury. In November 2014 during a theft trial, he ordered a new jury after all the selected jurors were white.

“There is not a single African-American on this jury and the defendant is an African-American man,” he said at the time. “I cannot in good conscience go forward with this jury.”

He referred the 2014 ruling in his latest ruling.

“We’ve already done this one time, so right off the bat, you’ve got a blueprint and we can be a lot more efficient, in theory.”

A local group of judges, lawyers, and citizens labeled as The Racial Fairness Commission have found that juries in the area have a repeat rate of lacking racial diversity. Additionally,  Appeals Court Judge Denise Clayton who is the head of the commission says,

“It’s a problem. We are not hitting that representation.”

Stevens’ actions have come under both praise and criticism.

The state supreme court will now review the issue.

Also, the [__U.S. Supreme Court began reviewing__](http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/11/2/supreme-court-troubled-by-racism-in-jury-selection.html) a case Monday for a black man who has been on death row for 30 years because  [__evidence surfaced__](http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/30/politics/death-penalty-race-trial-evidence/) that prosecutors deliberately kept black people off his jury, which might lead to a new trial for the man.

The U.S. Supreme Court [__ruled in 1986 t__](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batson_v._Kentucky)hat jurors cannot be excluded based on race.

**Jury & Race in America**

Across the nation, the right or wrong jury has the power to make or break a case. In fact, [__PINAC News reported on a Charlotte, NC trial__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/08/charlotte-cop-in-mistrial-wont-be-retried/) where the racial makeup of a jury led to the mistrial of a police officer who shot and killed an unarmed man.

In the Charlotte, NC trial– the jury was deadlocked 8-4, there were more white jurors than black jurors. The officer was white, and the dead victim was black.

[__The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution__](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/sixth_amendment) provides the right to an unbiased jury in criminal prosecutions. In the civil rights era, this amendment was abused consistently in unfair trials across the south and Jim Crow states.

Jury inequality infiltrated the very core of the justice system for years without any change. Even the effects of Martin Luther King and company didn’t have an immediate impact on the justice system when it came to fair trials and unbiased jury selection.

It was not until 1986 that the Supreme Court stepped in to stop biased jury selection; hence implementing the Batson ruling. To be fair, The Supreme Court ruled in the 1879 case of Strauder v. West Virginia that it is unconstitutional for only allowing white people to serve on juries. But, that ruling was unenforced and often ignored.

To this day, there is exoneration after exoneration of wrongfully convicted people of color due to unfair trials. Texas leads America in exoneration’s.

This week, the [__trial began for an Oklahoma police officer__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/11/oklahoma-officer-trial-raping-13-women/) accused of raping 13 prostitutes. The cop, Daniel Holtzclaw, is white. The victims were all black. And the jury is all white.

It is a sensitive issue that few are willing to talk or write about, but race still matters in America.

Everyone in the judicial system from police officers, to judges’, to prosecutors, to defense council, and the jury all have a significant duty in being fair and racially unbiased in doing their appointed duties that reflect and honor the United States Constitution.

In a judicial system where race is contentious, Judge Olu Stevens sought a mixed-raced jury. Studies [__have shown__](http://www.npr.org/2015/11/02/452898470/supreme-court-takes-on-racial-discrimination-in-jury-selection) that all-white juries have the tendency to convict ethnicities that are not caucasian.

In the Kentucky case with Judge Stevens, the jurors were selected from a pool of 37 white jurors and only three black jurors with two of the black jurors having already been eliminated before the final selection was made.

The Judge was presiding over a drug case last month involving a black defendant in the Jefferson County Circuit Court in Louisville, which has a population of 22 percent black residents.

According to the judge, an all white jury presented an unfair disadvantage for a fair verdict.

“The concern is that the panel is not representative of the community,” said Stevens.

This is the second time Judge Stevens has ordered a new jury. In November 2014 during a theft trial, he ordered a new jury after all the selected jurors were white.

“There is not a single African-American on this jury and the defendant is an African-American man,” he said at the time. “I cannot in good conscience go forward with this jury.”

He referred the 2014 ruling in his latest ruling.

“We’ve already done this one time, so right off the bat, you’ve got a blueprint and we can be a lot more efficient, in theory.”

A local group of judges, lawyers, and citizens labeled as The Racial Fairness Commission have found that juries in the area have a repeat rate of lacking racial diversity. Additionally,  Appeals Court Judge Denise Clayton who is the head of the commission says,

“It’s a problem. We are not hitting that representation.”

Stevens’ actions have come under both praise and criticism.

The state supreme court will now review the issue.

Also, the [__U.S. Supreme Court began reviewing__](http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/11/2/supreme-court-troubled-by-racism-in-jury-selection.html) a case Monday for a black man who has been on death row for 30 years because  [__evidence surfaced__](http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/30/politics/death-penalty-race-trial-evidence/) that prosecutors deliberately kept black people off his jury, which might lead to a new trial for the man.

The U.S. Supreme Court [__ruled in 1986 t__](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batson_v._Kentucky)hat jurors cannot be excluded based on race.

**Jury & Race in America**

Across the nation, the right or wrong jury has the power to make or break a case. In fact, [__PINAC News reported on a Charlotte, NC trial__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/08/charlotte-cop-in-mistrial-wont-be-retried/) where the racial makeup of a jury led to the mistrial of a police officer who shot and killed an unarmed man.

In the Charlotte, NC trial– the jury was deadlocked 8-4, there were more white jurors than black jurors. The officer was white, and the dead victim was black.

[__The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution__](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/sixth_amendment) provides the right to an unbiased jury in criminal prosecutions. In the civil rights era, this amendment was abused consistently in unfair trials across the south and Jim Crow states.

Jury inequality infiltrated the very core of the justice system for years without any change. Even the effects of Martin Luther King and company didn’t have an immediate impact on the justice system when it came to fair trials and unbiased jury selection.

It was not until 1986 that the Supreme Court stepped in to stop biased jury selection; hence implementing the Batson ruling. To be fair, The Supreme Court ruled in the 1879 case of Strauder v. West Virginia that it is unconstitutional for only allowing white people to serve on juries. But, that ruling was unenforced and often ignored.

To this day, there is exoneration after exoneration of wrongfully convicted people of color due to unfair trials. Texas leads America in exoneration’s.

This week, the [__trial began for an Oklahoma police officer__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/11/oklahoma-officer-trial-raping-13-women/) accused of raping 13 prostitutes. The cop, Daniel Holtzclaw, is white. The victims were all black. And the jury is all white.

It is a sensitive issue that few are willing to talk or write about, but race still matters in America.

Everyone in the judicial system from police officers, to judges’, to prosecutors, to defense council, and the jury all have a significant duty in being fair and racially unbiased in doing their appointed duties that reflect and honor the United States Constitution.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles