Alabama Cop Snatches Camera from Man Recording Police Station

Fearing a terrorist plot, an Alabama police officer snatched a camera from a man who was video recording a police station from across the street, turning the man’s camera off to keep it from recording.

However, the man had a back-up body camera that was live streaming.

“I don’t care about your First Amendment rights,” said the Wetumpka police officer, who has been identified as Charles Shannon.

“I don’t know if you’re a terrorist or not, trying to film our building.”

Oblivious to Shannon, it was not a terrorist plot, but a First Amendment audit conducted by Keith Golden, who runs the YouTube channel [__Bama Camera__](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq-aYGITpZMJ0iCA89C_geQ), where he routinely does First Amendment audits on government buildings.

Golden even tried to hand over a copy of [__Smith vs. Cumming,__](http://www.aele.org/law/2009all05/smith-cumming.html) the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that affirmed the video recording of police officers is not a crime.

But Golden would not hand over his identification nor provide his name at first, which is what bothered Shannon and the two other cops who had confronted him, one which appeared to be a plainclothes detective.

“I’m not required to carry ID,” said Golden. “Do you know Alabama law, sir?”

“Yes, I do, that’s why I’m a police officer,” Shannon responded, still holding onto Golden’s confiscated camera, which was on a monopod.

“Look up 15-5-30,” Golden said.

“I don’t have to, I know it,” Shannon responded.

But Shannon did not know it because he was under the impression that the law allows him to walk up to anybody and demand their identification or face arrest.

The law, posted below, states that the officer must have reasonable suspicion that a citizen is somehow involved in a crime before they are required to hand over their identification.

[__ALA CODE § 15-5-30 : Alabama Code – Section 15-5-30: AUTHORITY OF PEACE OFFICER TO STOP AND QUESTION__](http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/alcode/15/5/2/15-5-30#sthash.S0Blczla.dpuf)

A sheriff or other officer acting as sheriff, his deputy or any constable, acting within their respective counties, any marshal, deputy marshal or policeman of any incorporated city or town within the limits of the county or any highway patrolman or state trooper may stop any person abroad in a public place whom he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed or is about to commit a felony or other public offense and may demand of him his name, address and an explanation of his actions.

But like most cops, Shannon has learned that he can create his own laws and get away with it, which was why he then ordered Golden against a car and frisked him, telling him was detained.

That was when Golden told the officer his name.

Golden was eventually released, informed that it was his own fault for having his camera snatched and his pockets frisked because he did not bow down to their authority.

But Golden told them they were to blame.

“I hope you learn the law next time,” Golden said as he walked away.

“I know the law,” Shannon said.

“What’s 15-5-30?” Golden asked.

“I don’t have to answer your questions,” Shannon responded.

The incident took place on June 2. Golden contacted the Wetumpka Police Department the following day and was told that no report was ever made of the incident.

He was also informed that even though at least one cop was wearing a body cam, it was not turned on at the moment.

Thankfully, Golden’s body cam was turned on.

Call the Wetumpka Police Department at 334) 567-5321.

You can also leave a comment on the department’s [__Facebook page__](https://www.facebook.com/Wetumpka-Police-Dept-197346773620791/), but be sure to make a screenshot after you do because they have been deleting comments.

That’s also a violation of public records law, but what can we expect from a police department that does not know basic First Amendment or stop and identify laws?

Fearing a terrorist plot, an Alabama police officer snatched a camera from a man who was video recording a police station from across the street, turning the man’s camera off to keep it from recording.

However, the man had a back-up body camera that was live streaming.

“I don’t care about your First Amendment rights,” said the Wetumpka police officer, who has been identified as Charles Shannon.

“I don’t know if you’re a terrorist or not, trying to film our building.”

Oblivious to Shannon, it was not a terrorist plot, but a First Amendment audit conducted by Keith Golden, who runs the YouTube channel [__Bama Camera__](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq-aYGITpZMJ0iCA89C_geQ), where he routinely does First Amendment audits on government buildings.

Golden even tried to hand over a copy of [__Smith vs. Cumming,__](http://www.aele.org/law/2009all05/smith-cumming.html) the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that affirmed the video recording of police officers is not a crime.

But Golden would not hand over his identification nor provide his name at first, which is what bothered Shannon and the two other cops who had confronted him, one which appeared to be a plainclothes detective.

“I’m not required to carry ID,” said Golden. “Do you know Alabama law, sir?”

“Yes, I do, that’s why I’m a police officer,” Shannon responded, still holding onto Golden’s confiscated camera, which was on a monopod.

“Look up 15-5-30,” Golden said.

“I don’t have to, I know it,” Shannon responded.

But Shannon did not know it because he was under the impression that the law allows him to walk up to anybody and demand their identification or face arrest.

The law, posted below, states that the officer must have reasonable suspicion that a citizen is somehow involved in a crime before they are required to hand over their identification.

[__ALA CODE § 15-5-30 : Alabama Code – Section 15-5-30: AUTHORITY OF PEACE OFFICER TO STOP AND QUESTION__](http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/alcode/15/5/2/15-5-30#sthash.S0Blczla.dpuf)

A sheriff or other officer acting as sheriff, his deputy or any constable, acting within their respective counties, any marshal, deputy marshal or policeman of any incorporated city or town within the limits of the county or any highway patrolman or state trooper may stop any person abroad in a public place whom he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed or is about to commit a felony or other public offense and may demand of him his name, address and an explanation of his actions.

But like most cops, Shannon has learned that he can create his own laws and get away with it, which was why he then ordered Golden against a car and frisked him, telling him was detained.

That was when Golden told the officer his name.

Golden was eventually released, informed that it was his own fault for having his camera snatched and his pockets frisked because he did not bow down to their authority.

But Golden told them they were to blame.

“I hope you learn the law next time,” Golden said as he walked away.

“I know the law,” Shannon said.

“What’s 15-5-30?” Golden asked.

“I don’t have to answer your questions,” Shannon responded.

The incident took place on June 2. Golden contacted the Wetumpka Police Department the following day and was told that no report was ever made of the incident.

He was also informed that even though at least one cop was wearing a body cam, it was not turned on at the moment.

Thankfully, Golden’s body cam was turned on.

Call the Wetumpka Police Department at 334) 567-5321.

You can also leave a comment on the department’s [__Facebook page__](https://www.facebook.com/Wetumpka-Police-Dept-197346773620791/), but be sure to make a screenshot after you do because they have been deleting comments.

That’s also a violation of public records law, but what can we expect from a police department that does not know basic First Amendment or stop and identify laws?

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles