Colorado Man Detained for Recording Police Station Awarded $41,000 Settlement

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=322&v=sV6nsq6IIHg

A man who was placed in the back of a police car for recording outside a Colorado Springs police station will receive a $41,000 settlement.

Terrell Clayton, who runs the YouTube Channel, News Now Colorado, was conducting a First Amendment audit outside the station on November 2 when he was confronted by two Colorado Springs police officers.

The cops demanded his identification, telling him he was “acting suspicious” by recording the police station, informing him it was disorderly conduct.

When Clayton continued to debate the cops on the law, given that they had no clue, they ripped the camera out of his hands, and placed him in the back of a patrol car.

Part of the settlement requires the Colorado Springs Police Department to add to its general order the following statement:

“Taking photographs or recording from a public place in and of itself does not constitute suspicious activity.”

You would think they would know this by now, not that they ever teach it in the police academy, but there have been numerous videos showing cops proven wrong about photography being a suspicious activity.

So let me repeat for the cops and their apologists who are still clueless:

“Taking photographs or recording from a public place in and of itself does not constitute suspicious activity.”

According to the Colorado Springs Gazette:

The city also must create and publish a “roll-call video addressing the First Amendment right to record police activity,” and it will require officers to view that video by the end of the year, the settlement said.

Those actions are “underway,” police spokesman Lt. Howard Black said Wednesday.

The video Clayton posted shows him zooming his camera in on police vehicles parked inside the lot before an officer approaches and asks Clayton his name.

The photographer declines to provide it, saying he’s filming squad cars for a story but doesn’t plan to disclose license plate information.

A second officer questions Clayton about pointing the camera toward the lot, saying he’s “not buying” the story. That officer threatens to detain Clayton if he doesn’t identify himself, eventually grabbing Clayton and taking his camera.

“We’ll do it my way,” the officer is heard saying.

Clayton is led to the patrol car, where he continues recording on a cellphone before that also is confiscated. Clayton said the officers threatened to arrest him if he did not provide an ID, which he eventually did.

“I was very shocked at how quickly these officers violated my rights,” he says in a description of the video.

But even though it’s been six months since the incident, Colorado Springs police have not yet decided whether the two cops will face disciplinary action for costing taxpayers $41,000.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=322&v=sV6nsq6IIHg

A man who was placed in the back of a police car for recording outside a Colorado Springs police station will receive a $41,000 settlement.

Terrell Clayton, who runs the YouTube Channel, News Now Colorado, was conducting a First Amendment audit outside the station on November 2 when he was confronted by two Colorado Springs police officers.

The cops demanded his identification, telling him he was “acting suspicious” by recording the police station, informing him it was disorderly conduct.

When Clayton continued to debate the cops on the law, given that they had no clue, they ripped the camera out of his hands, and placed him in the back of a patrol car.

Part of the settlement requires the Colorado Springs Police Department to add to its general order the following statement:

“Taking photographs or recording from a public place in and of itself does not constitute suspicious activity.”

You would think they would know this by now, not that they ever teach it in the police academy, but there have been numerous videos showing cops proven wrong about photography being a suspicious activity.

So let me repeat for the cops and their apologists who are still clueless:

“Taking photographs or recording from a public place in and of itself does not constitute suspicious activity.”

According to the Colorado Springs Gazette:

The city also must create and publish a “roll-call video addressing the First Amendment right to record police activity,” and it will require officers to view that video by the end of the year, the settlement said.

Those actions are “underway,” police spokesman Lt. Howard Black said Wednesday.

The video Clayton posted shows him zooming his camera in on police vehicles parked inside the lot before an officer approaches and asks Clayton his name.

The photographer declines to provide it, saying he’s filming squad cars for a story but doesn’t plan to disclose license plate information.

A second officer questions Clayton about pointing the camera toward the lot, saying he’s “not buying” the story. That officer threatens to detain Clayton if he doesn’t identify himself, eventually grabbing Clayton and taking his camera.

“We’ll do it my way,” the officer is heard saying.

Clayton is led to the patrol car, where he continues recording on a cellphone before that also is confiscated. Clayton said the officers threatened to arrest him if he did not provide an ID, which he eventually did.

“I was very shocked at how quickly these officers violated my rights,” he says in a description of the video.

But even though it’s been six months since the incident, Colorado Springs police have not yet decided whether the two cops will face disciplinary action for costing taxpayers $41,000.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles