California Strippers Awarded $1.5 Million Settlement over Police Raids

Wearing bulletproof vests and wielding guns, San Diego police raided two strip clubs, ordering the women to line up in the dressing room where they proceeded to photograph their tattoos and city-issued permits.

The cops also “made arrogant and demeaning comments to the entertainers and ordered them to expose body parts so that they could ostensibly photograph their tattoos,” according to a lawsuit filed by the dancers.

On Tuesday, the San Diego City Council approved a $1.5 million settlement that will be divided among 17 women.

One woman will receive $110,000 and $1.4 million will be split among the other 16 women.

According to ABC10News:

> “”I felt like it was really, really, like, uncomfortable,” dancer Brittany Murphy told 10News in 2014. “I don’t understand why I have to get my picture taken. I asked them if it was of my face and they said yes. So, I got up against the locker and [the officer] is standing really far. She’s taking a photo of my entire body.””

Lieutenant Mayer stated that the photographs of the dancers were taken for investigative purposes. The excuse they used was that they needed a way to identify the women since they are constantly changing their looks.

In March, a federal judge ruled that the dancers’ First Amendment rights were indeed violated but did not make a ruling on the claims of Fourth Amendment violations.

San Diego Police Lieutenant Kevin Mayer stated the following back in 2014 when the second raid happened:

> “One of the many responsibilities of the San Diego Police Department’s Vice Unit is to conduct random inspections of strip clubs to ensure dancers are complying with the law and that they have an entertainers permit.”

Lawyers for the department attempted to stop the lawsuit claiming the municipal code gave them permission, but U.S. District Judge James Lorenz denied their request stating the the municipal code is unconstitutional.

“The Inspection Provision does not prevent the Chief of Police from using inspections as a means of harassing and discouraging adult entertainment businesses, and therefore violated the First Amendment on its face,” stated Judge Lorenz in his order that was filed in March.

- Advertisement -

Wearing bulletproof vests and wielding guns, San Diego police raided two strip clubs, ordering the women to line up in the dressing room where they proceeded to photograph their tattoos and city-issued permits.

The cops also “made arrogant and demeaning comments to the entertainers and ordered them to expose body parts so that they could ostensibly photograph their tattoos,” according to a lawsuit filed by the dancers.

On Tuesday, the San Diego City Council approved a $1.5 million settlement that will be divided among 17 women.

One woman will receive $110,000 and $1.4 million will be split among the other 16 women.

According to ABC10News:

> “”I felt like it was really, really, like, uncomfortable,” dancer Brittany Murphy told 10News in 2014. “I don’t understand why I have to get my picture taken. I asked them if it was of my face and they said yes. So, I got up against the locker and [the officer] is standing really far. She’s taking a photo of my entire body.””

Lieutenant Mayer stated that the photographs of the dancers were taken for investigative purposes. The excuse they used was that they needed a way to identify the women since they are constantly changing their looks.

In March, a federal judge ruled that the dancers’ First Amendment rights were indeed violated but did not make a ruling on the claims of Fourth Amendment violations.

San Diego Police Lieutenant Kevin Mayer stated the following back in 2014 when the second raid happened:

> “One of the many responsibilities of the San Diego Police Department’s Vice Unit is to conduct random inspections of strip clubs to ensure dancers are complying with the law and that they have an entertainers permit.”

Lawyers for the department attempted to stop the lawsuit claiming the municipal code gave them permission, but U.S. District Judge James Lorenz denied their request stating the the municipal code is unconstitutional.

“The Inspection Provision does not prevent the Chief of Police from using inspections as a means of harassing and discouraging adult entertainment businesses, and therefore violated the First Amendment on its face,” stated Judge Lorenz in his order that was filed in March.

- Advertisement -

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles