Cop Sued for Claiming he had Right to Snatch Camera from Man Recording in Public

A Missouri cop who claimed it was illegal to record police officers from 200 feet away is now the subject of a lawsuit that should prove him wrong.

Pevely police officer Wayne Casey is now being sued over the January incident in which he snatched a smartphone from a man who had been recording a traffic stop from across the street.

Matthew Rankin filed his lawsuit Thursday against Casey and the City of Pevely, a municipality of less than 6,000 people.

Casey, however, was fired last month in an unrelated incident where he sat at his desk inside police station watching another cop named Robert “Ryan” Watson choking and shoving an inmate who had insulted him. Casey had only been hired a year earlier.

Casey claims he feared for his life because he saw a flashing red light from Rankin’s phone but not only did Rankin deny it, there is no red light visible from Rankin’s phone during the entire 10-minute video.

He then accused Rankin of “interfering” because he was distracted by Rankin recording.

According to the lawsuit, which can be read here:

On January 16, 2019, at about 12:15 AM, Mr. Rankin observed a traffic stop in the City of Pevely, County of Jefferson, Missouri and began recording the scene with his mobile camera approximately 200 feet away.

Defendant Officer Casey observed that Mr. Rankin was recording the traffic stop.

Casey then got into his police car and drove over to where Mr. Rankin was standing.

Casey asked Mr. Rankin if he has ID with him.

Mr. Rankin responded that he did not.

Mr. Rankin then advised Casey that it is not a “stop and ID state.”

Casey responded that in fact it is.

Casey continued to state that in the state of Missouri it is now illegal to record police officers.

Casey then said, “I can seize your phone right now as evidence.”

Casey then said, “Let me see your phone. Go ahead and hand it.”

Mr. Rankin said, “No.”

Casey then said, “Hand it right now or I will place you under arrest.”

Mr. Rankin then said, “Sir, you just committed a couple felonies. Its protected…”

Casey then shouted over Mr. Rankin, “Listen do you understand what I just said to you?!”

Casey continued to shout at Mr. Rankin, “Stop it right now. Stop it right now.”

Mr. Rankin attempted to calmly respond, but Casey instead aggressively grabbed Mr. Rankin’s left hand and placed his thumb in a “thumb lock” with his right hand, and used pain compliance to pry Plaintiff’s hand open to retrieve his cell phone.

Casey then turned off the live stream which Mr. Rankin was using to record, and began scrolling through Mr. Rankin’s phone, viewing its contents.

Casey again reiterated in a loud tone, “It is illegal in the State of Missouri to film us.”

Mr. Rankin responded, “The Supreme Court already ruled against that sir.”

Casey shouted back, “No. Bull.”

Casey continued, “I am going to seize your phone as evidence.”

Casey is a perfect example of cops who are not ashamed or embarrassed to lie so blatantly without even a shred of common sense to not do so while being live streamed.

Casey’s opinion on it being illegal to record cops in public likely stems from a 2017 decision by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals that sided with a lower court in a case where a man had been arrested several times for recording police and other government employees inside a public building.

U.S. District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey wrote that a citizen “has no constitutional right to videotape any public proceedings he wishes to.”

However, as the Washington D.C.-based Student Press Law Center points out, the ruling does not meant

Akins sued the City of Columbia, its police department and individual law enforcement officials in May 2015 for what he alleged was a pattern of retaliatory arrests, harassment and confiscation of property motivated by his police watchdog activism. U.S. District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey threw out his constitutional claims, ruling in part that a citizen “has no constitutional right to videotape any public proceedings he wishes to.”

The appeals court did not discuss the substance of the lower-court ruling, but simply found no legal basis to reverse it.

The Akins ruling does nothing to disturb, or contradict, the unbroken string of federal appeals-court rulings vindicating the constitutional right of anyone — citizens as well as journalists — to capture video, images and audio of law enforcement officers when they conduct official business in places visible to the public.

Most recently, federal appeals courts in Philadelphia (Fields v. City of Philadelphia) and in New Orleans (Turner v. Driver) upheld the right to bring constitutional claims against police agencies that interfere with audio or video recording of their officers. That makes four out of 12 regional appellate courts to affirm that recording police activity is constitutionally protected; none has squarely ruled otherwise.

Meanwhile, please keep your eyes open in case Wayne Casey ends up hired at another police department.

Watch the shortened, edited video above and the full, unedited video below where he insinuates the phone is a weapon, making him fear for his life.

A Missouri cop who claimed it was illegal to record police officers from 200 feet away is now the subject of a lawsuit that should prove him wrong.

Pevely police officer Wayne Casey is now being sued over the January incident in which he snatched a smartphone from a man who had been recording a traffic stop from across the street.

Matthew Rankin filed his lawsuit Thursday against Casey and the City of Pevely, a municipality of less than 6,000 people.

Casey, however, was fired last month in an unrelated incident where he sat at his desk inside police station watching another cop named Robert “Ryan” Watson choking and shoving an inmate who had insulted him. Casey had only been hired a year earlier.

Casey claims he feared for his life because he saw a flashing red light from Rankin’s phone but not only did Rankin deny it, there is no red light visible from Rankin’s phone during the entire 10-minute video.

He then accused Rankin of “interfering” because he was distracted by Rankin recording.

According to the lawsuit, which can be read here:

On January 16, 2019, at about 12:15 AM, Mr. Rankin observed a traffic stop in the City of Pevely, County of Jefferson, Missouri and began recording the scene with his mobile camera approximately 200 feet away.

Defendant Officer Casey observed that Mr. Rankin was recording the traffic stop.

Casey then got into his police car and drove over to where Mr. Rankin was standing.

Casey asked Mr. Rankin if he has ID with him.

Mr. Rankin responded that he did not.

Mr. Rankin then advised Casey that it is not a “stop and ID state.”

Casey responded that in fact it is.

Casey continued to state that in the state of Missouri it is now illegal to record police officers.

Casey then said, “I can seize your phone right now as evidence.”

Casey then said, “Let me see your phone. Go ahead and hand it.”

Mr. Rankin said, “No.”

Casey then said, “Hand it right now or I will place you under arrest.”

Mr. Rankin then said, “Sir, you just committed a couple felonies. Its protected…”

Casey then shouted over Mr. Rankin, “Listen do you understand what I just said to you?!”

Casey continued to shout at Mr. Rankin, “Stop it right now. Stop it right now.”

Mr. Rankin attempted to calmly respond, but Casey instead aggressively grabbed Mr. Rankin’s left hand and placed his thumb in a “thumb lock” with his right hand, and used pain compliance to pry Plaintiff’s hand open to retrieve his cell phone.

Casey then turned off the live stream which Mr. Rankin was using to record, and began scrolling through Mr. Rankin’s phone, viewing its contents.

Casey again reiterated in a loud tone, “It is illegal in the State of Missouri to film us.”

Mr. Rankin responded, “The Supreme Court already ruled against that sir.”

Casey shouted back, “No. Bull.”

Casey continued, “I am going to seize your phone as evidence.”

Casey is a perfect example of cops who are not ashamed or embarrassed to lie so blatantly without even a shred of common sense to not do so while being live streamed.

Casey’s opinion on it being illegal to record cops in public likely stems from a 2017 decision by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals that sided with a lower court in a case where a man had been arrested several times for recording police and other government employees inside a public building.

U.S. District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey wrote that a citizen “has no constitutional right to videotape any public proceedings he wishes to.”

However, as the Washington D.C.-based Student Press Law Center points out, the ruling does not meant

Akins sued the City of Columbia, its police department and individual law enforcement officials in May 2015 for what he alleged was a pattern of retaliatory arrests, harassment and confiscation of property motivated by his police watchdog activism. U.S. District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey threw out his constitutional claims, ruling in part that a citizen “has no constitutional right to videotape any public proceedings he wishes to.”

The appeals court did not discuss the substance of the lower-court ruling, but simply found no legal basis to reverse it.

The Akins ruling does nothing to disturb, or contradict, the unbroken string of federal appeals-court rulings vindicating the constitutional right of anyone — citizens as well as journalists — to capture video, images and audio of law enforcement officers when they conduct official business in places visible to the public.

Most recently, federal appeals courts in Philadelphia (Fields v. City of Philadelphia) and in New Orleans (Turner v. Driver) upheld the right to bring constitutional claims against police agencies that interfere with audio or video recording of their officers. That makes four out of 12 regional appellate courts to affirm that recording police activity is constitutionally protected; none has squarely ruled otherwise.

Meanwhile, please keep your eyes open in case Wayne Casey ends up hired at another police department.

Watch the shortened, edited video above and the full, unedited video below where he insinuates the phone is a weapon, making him fear for his life.

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Miller
Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles