Pittsburgh Police say Bodycam Footage that may Exonerate Cop no Longer Exists

Last year, Pittsburgh police officers Kaelen O’Connor and Robert Kramer were fired over a road rage incident. It was alleged that Kramer, while off-duty, pulled a gun on a man after a traffic dispute and that O’Connor purposely left information out of his report.

But Kramer was acquitted of the charges of simple assault last month due to lack of evidence.

However, charges of obstructing justice and hindering apprehension are still pending against O’Connor. And his attorney, William Diffenderfer, is claiming that police are withholding bodycam video that may exonerate him.

Police have told him the video was recorded over, so the clip he is looking for does not exist. Diffenderfer believes they are lying to keep from having to rehire his client.

The video is from the bodycam of a third officer who had an unrelated interaction with Jesse Smith, the same man who had accused Kramer of pointing a gun at him.

In that incident, Smith threatened to report Pittsburgh police officer James Votash “and get him fired, just like he did Officer Kramer and Officer O’Connor,” according to Diffenderfer.

The attorney has requested a hearing before Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Mark V. Tranquilli to figure out what happened to the video “under oath,” according to the motion that was filed.

Diffenderfer believes that if the video truly is recorded over, that it was done intentionally. It is not clear how the video could help his client considering it was from an unrelated incident, even if it did involve the same man.

According to Tribune-Review:

> “I find it extremely suspicious that it is missing, but they might have a very good explanation for it,” he said. “On the other hand, I still think I might get it. If they’re claiming that it’s not here, I want to know how that happened.”

​Votash stated that he recorded the conversation and testified about his interaction with Smith in May stating that he followed department procedure filing it and showing his supervisors but no record of it could be found.

“I find it disturbing and outrageous that the video is missing, especially when it’s a critical component to these officers’ cases,” said Robert Swartzwelder, president of Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge 1.

Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge 1, Robert Swartzwelder, said since Kramer was acquitted, he plans to seek not only reinstatement for Kramer but with full back pay and benefits and would do the same for O’Connor if his case is dismissed.

The Pittsburgh Public Safety Department has declined to comment on this.

- Advertisement -

Last year, Pittsburgh police officers Kaelen O’Connor and Robert Kramer were fired over a road rage incident. It was alleged that Kramer, while off-duty, pulled a gun on a man after a traffic dispute and that O’Connor purposely left information out of his report.

But Kramer was acquitted of the charges of simple assault last month due to lack of evidence.

However, charges of obstructing justice and hindering apprehension are still pending against O’Connor. And his attorney, William Diffenderfer, is claiming that police are withholding bodycam video that may exonerate him.

Police have told him the video was recorded over, so the clip he is looking for does not exist. Diffenderfer believes they are lying to keep from having to rehire his client.

The video is from the bodycam of a third officer who had an unrelated interaction with Jesse Smith, the same man who had accused Kramer of pointing a gun at him.

In that incident, Smith threatened to report Pittsburgh police officer James Votash “and get him fired, just like he did Officer Kramer and Officer O’Connor,” according to Diffenderfer.

The attorney has requested a hearing before Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Mark V. Tranquilli to figure out what happened to the video “under oath,” according to the motion that was filed.

Diffenderfer believes that if the video truly is recorded over, that it was done intentionally. It is not clear how the video could help his client considering it was from an unrelated incident, even if it did involve the same man.

According to Tribune-Review:

> “I find it extremely suspicious that it is missing, but they might have a very good explanation for it,” he said. “On the other hand, I still think I might get it. If they’re claiming that it’s not here, I want to know how that happened.”

​Votash stated that he recorded the conversation and testified about his interaction with Smith in May stating that he followed department procedure filing it and showing his supervisors but no record of it could be found.

“I find it disturbing and outrageous that the video is missing, especially when it’s a critical component to these officers’ cases,” said Robert Swartzwelder, president of Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge 1.

Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge 1, Robert Swartzwelder, said since Kramer was acquitted, he plans to seek not only reinstatement for Kramer but with full back pay and benefits and would do the same for O’Connor if his case is dismissed.

The Pittsburgh Public Safety Department has declined to comment on this.

- Advertisement -

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles