Photographers’ rights in UK remain undefined as harassment continues

Several incidents of photographers getting harassed, accused of terrorism and threatened with arrest in the United Kingdom over the last few months have put more pressure on politicians to define the laws regarding photography.

The incidents include:

  • A wedding photographer who was stripped of her camera and detained for 45 minutes under the Terrorism Act on December 15.
  • Two photojournalists who were obstructed from documenting a protest in front of the Greek embassy in London, including one who was physically removed from the area and another who had an officer attempt to snatch his camera on December 3 (check out above video).
  • A photographer who was fined for photographing a drunk woman on a sidewalk in October.

Unlike the United States, where several court cases have already determined that photography is a First Amendment right (not that American cops are aware of this), laws in the UK regarding photography are vague. And the current crop of politicians is not doing much to clarify the law.

Although the law states that photographers do have the right to take pictures in public, there are some exceptions. And these are just as muddled as an East London Cockney accent.

Vernon Coaker, the Minister for Security, Counter-terrorism, Crime and Policing wrote to Jeremy Dear, general secretary of the National Union of Journalists. His letter, dated 3 December 2008 confirms that photography can be “limited” in public places in “special circumstances”:
“This may be on the grounds of national security or there may be situations in which the taking of photographs may cause or lead to public order situations or inflame an already tense situation or raise security considerations.

So it’s basically up to the officers, not the law books, to determine when and where photography is allowed, as well as whom can be photographed.

Earlier this month, the National Policing Improvement Agency published new guidelines regarding photography.

And while they do seem to respect the rights of photographers, they also give the officer the authority to arrest the photographer or seize his memory card, if he is suspected of being part of a “hostile terrorist reconnaissance”.

So in other words, if you look Middle-Eastern or have an Irish accent, your chances of getting arrested for photography increase significantly.

Several incidents of photographers getting harassed, accused of terrorism and threatened with arrest in the United Kingdom over the last few months have put more pressure on politicians to define the laws regarding photography.

The incidents include:

  • A wedding photographer who was stripped of her camera and detained for 45 minutes under the Terrorism Act on December 15.
  • Two photojournalists who were obstructed from documenting a protest in front of the Greek embassy in London, including one who was physically removed from the area and another who had an officer attempt to snatch his camera on December 3 (check out above video).
  • A photographer who was fined for photographing a drunk woman on a sidewalk in October.

Unlike the United States, where several court cases have already determined that photography is a First Amendment right (not that American cops are aware of this), laws in the UK regarding photography are vague. And the current crop of politicians is not doing much to clarify the law.

Although the law states that photographers do have the right to take pictures in public, there are some exceptions. And these are just as muddled as an East London Cockney accent.

Vernon Coaker, the Minister for Security, Counter-terrorism, Crime and Policing wrote to Jeremy Dear, general secretary of the National Union of Journalists. His letter, dated 3 December 2008 confirms that photography can be “limited” in public places in “special circumstances”:
“This may be on the grounds of national security or there may be situations in which the taking of photographs may cause or lead to public order situations or inflame an already tense situation or raise security considerations.

So it’s basically up to the officers, not the law books, to determine when and where photography is allowed, as well as whom can be photographed.

Earlier this month, the National Policing Improvement Agency published new guidelines regarding photography.

And while they do seem to respect the rights of photographers, they also give the officer the authority to arrest the photographer or seize his memory card, if he is suspected of being part of a “hostile terrorist reconnaissance”.

So in other words, if you look Middle-Eastern or have an Irish accent, your chances of getting arrested for photography increase significantly.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles