NPPA demands Amtrak to stop harassing photographers



The National Press Photographer’s Association has issued a letter to Amtrak, demanding it to stop harassing photographers for exercising their First Amendment rights.

The letter is long overdue because NPPA claims it has received several complaints over the last few months about photographers being harassed.

But apparently last month’s arrest of Duane Kerzic for photographing trains for an Amtrak photo contest prompted NPPA to fire off a letter to Amtrak, ordering the train company to “take immediate steps to remedy the railroad’s unconstitutional treatment of law-abiding photographers.”

Now I’ve been a member of NPPA for several years and receive their magazine on a monthly basis, but I have to be honest. It never showed much interest in my case, despite me trying to prove my innocence for the last two years.

From what I’ve seen, NPPA doesn’t regard you as a legitimate photojournalist unless you are employed by a mainstream publication (as opposed to the Society of Professional Journalists who believe the First Amendment applies to all journalists, including Joshua Wolf, a man who was considered just a “blogger” by many media organizations and newspapers when he was jailed for refusing to turn over video outtakes of a protest to a judge).

But perhaps the New York NPPA chapter is more aggressive because it did join several other media organizations in 2004 to protest a proposed ban on photography in New York City’s subway system.

According to the NPPA website:

NPPA’s general legal counsel Mickey H. Osterreicher wrote to Amtrak police general counsel DavidDomzalski asking the railroad to immediately issue a directive to all Amtrak personnel making it clear that the mere act of taking pictures or video is not unlawful, and that doing so provides “no basis for law enforcement or other transit personnel to take action against a photographer.”

“As far as we can determine, there are no pertinent laws, rules, or regulations specifically prohibiting photography nor any Amtrak rules or regulations establishing a permit scheme,” Osterreicher said.

“Given that photography of public areas is protected by the First Amendment, we believe Amtrak’s actions are plainly unconstitutional. We are particularly surprised by Amtrak’s actions in light of the fact that the MTA [New York State’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority], which also patrols [New York’s] Penn Station, abandoned proposed changes in rulemaking to prohibit photography in 2005, and its corporate counsel, MaryMahon, ordered the MTA police to stop harassing photographers on its publicly accessible properties.”

As it turns out, another photographer named Michael Bortzman was arrested by Amtrak police in Penn Station last year for criminal trespass after he photographed an Amtrak train. He ended up suing and winning a few thousand dollars.

The issue is also timely considering thousands of people will soon descend upon Washington DC for the presidential inauguration, where Amtrak has a history of harassing photographers in Union Station.



The National Press Photographer’s Association has issued a letter to Amtrak, demanding it to stop harassing photographers for exercising their First Amendment rights.

The letter is long overdue because NPPA claims it has received several complaints over the last few months about photographers being harassed.

But apparently last month’s arrest of Duane Kerzic for photographing trains for an Amtrak photo contest prompted NPPA to fire off a letter to Amtrak, ordering the train company to “take immediate steps to remedy the railroad’s unconstitutional treatment of law-abiding photographers.”

Now I’ve been a member of NPPA for several years and receive their magazine on a monthly basis, but I have to be honest. It never showed much interest in my case, despite me trying to prove my innocence for the last two years.

From what I’ve seen, NPPA doesn’t regard you as a legitimate photojournalist unless you are employed by a mainstream publication (as opposed to the Society of Professional Journalists who believe the First Amendment applies to all journalists, including Joshua Wolf, a man who was considered just a “blogger” by many media organizations and newspapers when he was jailed for refusing to turn over video outtakes of a protest to a judge).

But perhaps the New York NPPA chapter is more aggressive because it did join several other media organizations in 2004 to protest a proposed ban on photography in New York City’s subway system.

According to the NPPA website:

NPPA’s general legal counsel Mickey H. Osterreicher wrote to Amtrak police general counsel DavidDomzalski asking the railroad to immediately issue a directive to all Amtrak personnel making it clear that the mere act of taking pictures or video is not unlawful, and that doing so provides “no basis for law enforcement or other transit personnel to take action against a photographer.”

“As far as we can determine, there are no pertinent laws, rules, or regulations specifically prohibiting photography nor any Amtrak rules or regulations establishing a permit scheme,” Osterreicher said.

“Given that photography of public areas is protected by the First Amendment, we believe Amtrak’s actions are plainly unconstitutional. We are particularly surprised by Amtrak’s actions in light of the fact that the MTA [New York State’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority], which also patrols [New York’s] Penn Station, abandoned proposed changes in rulemaking to prohibit photography in 2005, and its corporate counsel, MaryMahon, ordered the MTA police to stop harassing photographers on its publicly accessible properties.”

As it turns out, another photographer named Michael Bortzman was arrested by Amtrak police in Penn Station last year for criminal trespass after he photographed an Amtrak train. He ended up suing and winning a few thousand dollars.

The issue is also timely considering thousands of people will soon descend upon Washington DC for the presidential inauguration, where Amtrak has a history of harassing photographers in Union Station.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles