Do police have the right to confiscate your camera?

Seconds after BART police officer Johannes Mehserle shot and killed Oscar Grant, police immediately began confiscating cell phones containing videos that have yet to see the light of day.

In fact, the only videos that have been seen by the public were filmed by people who managed to leave the scene before police confronted them.

In one instance, police chased after [__Karina Vargas__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/watch?v=s_K0PISpxx4) after she stepped on the train, banging on the window after the doors closed and demanding her to turn over the camera. The train sped away with Vargas still holding her camera.

Her video, which did not show the actual shooting but captured the turmoil before and after, was one of the first to pop up on the internet. And soon after more videos popped up showing the actual shooting.

In the most [__vivid video__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/new-video-of-bart-shooting-emerges-offering-clearest-view-so-far-and-audio2), the train doors can be seen closing seconds after the shooting as the train speeds away.

But the truth is, police had no legal right to confiscate a single camera.

“Cops may be entitled to ask for people’s names and addresses and may even go as far as subpoenaing the video tape, but as far as confiscating the camera on the spot, no,” said [__Marc Randazza__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/randazza.wordpress.com), A First Amendment attorney based out of Florida and a *Photography is Not a Crime* reader.

[__Bert P. Krages II__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/www.krages.com), the Oregon attorney who drafted the widely distributed [__The Photographer’s Rights__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ThePhotographersRight.pdf) guide, responded to my inquiry with the following e-mail message:

“In general, police cannot confiscate cameras or media without some sort of court order. One exception is when a camera is actually being used in the commission of crime (e.g., child pornography, counterfeiting, upskirting).”

It didn’t appear that the BART videos were being used in a commission of a crime, so what could people have done to prevent police from illegally confiscating their cameras?

“Probably not a whole lot,” said Randazza. “You don’t want to get into a situation where you are refusing to comply with law enforcement, especially when that law enforcement officer just shot and killed somebody. No camera is worth losing your life over.”

But what can you do if you’re as stubborn as me and have a tendency to refuse unlawful orders?

“Make sure you have an attorney that specializes in First Amendment law,” he said during Monday’s phone interview. “Make sure you have his cell phone and home number. Sometimes calling an attorney on the spot can be helpful.”

Needless to say, I now have Randazza’s cell phone number programed into my cell phone.

-30-

*I am a multimedia journalist who has been fighting a* [*__lengthy legal battle__*](https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2009/01/2009/01/20/about/) *after having photographed Miami police against their wishes in Feb. 2007. Please help the fight by donating to my Legal Defense Fund in the top left sidebar. And feel free to join my* [*__Facebook__*](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/photography_is_not_a_crime) *blog network to keep updated on the latest articles.*

*You can also purchase Krages’ book on photographer rights that is listed in the right sidebar and help this blog in the process.*

Seconds after BART police officer Johannes Mehserle shot and killed Oscar Grant, police immediately began confiscating cell phones containing videos that have yet to see the light of day.

In fact, the only videos that have been seen by the public were filmed by people who managed to leave the scene before police confronted them.

In one instance, police chased after [__Karina Vargas__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/watch?v=s_K0PISpxx4) after she stepped on the train, banging on the window after the doors closed and demanding her to turn over the camera. The train sped away with Vargas still holding her camera.

Her video, which did not show the actual shooting but captured the turmoil before and after, was one of the first to pop up on the internet. And soon after more videos popped up showing the actual shooting.

In the most [__vivid video__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/new-video-of-bart-shooting-emerges-offering-clearest-view-so-far-and-audio2), the train doors can be seen closing seconds after the shooting as the train speeds away.

But the truth is, police had no legal right to confiscate a single camera.

“Cops may be entitled to ask for people’s names and addresses and may even go as far as subpoenaing the video tape, but as far as confiscating the camera on the spot, no,” said [__Marc Randazza__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/randazza.wordpress.com), A First Amendment attorney based out of Florida and a *Photography is Not a Crime* reader.

[__Bert P. Krages II__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/www.krages.com), the Oregon attorney who drafted the widely distributed [__The Photographer’s Rights__](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ThePhotographersRight.pdf) guide, responded to my inquiry with the following e-mail message:

“In general, police cannot confiscate cameras or media without some sort of court order. One exception is when a camera is actually being used in the commission of crime (e.g., child pornography, counterfeiting, upskirting).”

It didn’t appear that the BART videos were being used in a commission of a crime, so what could people have done to prevent police from illegally confiscating their cameras?

“Probably not a whole lot,” said Randazza. “You don’t want to get into a situation where you are refusing to comply with law enforcement, especially when that law enforcement officer just shot and killed somebody. No camera is worth losing your life over.”

But what can you do if you’re as stubborn as me and have a tendency to refuse unlawful orders?

“Make sure you have an attorney that specializes in First Amendment law,” he said during Monday’s phone interview. “Make sure you have his cell phone and home number. Sometimes calling an attorney on the spot can be helpful.”

Needless to say, I now have Randazza’s cell phone number programed into my cell phone.

-30-

*I am a multimedia journalist who has been fighting a* [*__lengthy legal battle__*](https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2009/01/2009/01/20/about/) *after having photographed Miami police against their wishes in Feb. 2007. Please help the fight by donating to my Legal Defense Fund in the top left sidebar. And feel free to join my* [*__Facebook__*](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/photography_is_not_a_crime) *blog network to keep updated on the latest articles.*

*You can also purchase Krages’ book on photographer rights that is listed in the right sidebar and help this blog in the process.*

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles