Boston Police Command Staff Encourages and Participates in Misconduct

Boston police officers once again failed to wear their badges or identify themselves at a public event, but this time one of the 23 top ranking cops from the department’s “[__command staff__](http://bpdnews.com/news/2014/1/14/police-commissioner-william-evans-appoints-the-most-diverse-command-staff-in-the-history-of-the-boston-police-department)” was on hand to step in.

Sadly, when Deputy Superintendent William Ridge did involve himself in the incident, he joined in with his officers in their unlawful behavior and took it a step further by trying to intimidate me.

On July 4 in Massachusetts, Boston police deployed outside of the Esplanade area where Boston’s Independence Day celebration was being held. I was there to document the [__police checkpoints at the Esplanade__](http://baystateexaminer.com/independence-day-marred-by-police-state-checkpoints/) itself, but on my way I noticed four Boston police officers standing in a doorway.

Two of the rifle-toting cops were not displaying their badges, so I asked them to identify themselves as required by the [__Massachusetts police ID card law.__](https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleVII/Chapter41/Section98d) They refused.

I then asked all of the officers to comply with the state law that requires municipal police officers to carry and show a police ID upon lawful request. Three out of four of the officers refused and the fourth would only show his card to me off camera.

At the officer’s request, I turned off my camera and to his credit, he began to take out his ID card. But Ridge, who had been standing nearby, suddenly walked up to intervene, ordering the officer not to identify himself.

I resumed recording as Ridge refused to show his own ID card, ordered all of the officers not to identify themselves and then attempted to intimidate me by getting in my face and standing as close to me as possible without touching me.

Ridge ordered me to leave, even though I was standing on a public sidewalk and had the right to be there. I chose to walk away at that point because I did not want to be falsely arrested or injured.

This blatant attack on my First Amendment rights to record came only two months after the Boston police publicly apologized for a similar incident. Sergeant Henry Staines got in a man’s face, told him not to record an incident and flashed a realistic-looking toy gun at him to intimidate him. Boston Police Commissioner William Evans told the media that the Boston police would be retrained after [__the disturbing video__](http://baystateexaminer.com/boston-police-sergeant-apologizes-to-man-after-video-goes-viral/) went viral.

According to Evans, Boston police are not only aware that people have the right to record them while in public, they are also trained to always wear their badges and identify themselves to the public. After police in Ferguson were criticized for [__concealing their name tags__](http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2014/08/15/ferguson_police_nametags_reportedly_haven_t_been_worn.html), Evans told WGBH’s Boston Public Radio, “We have a clear policy that if anyone asks for our identity or our badge number, we clearly give it to them. We like to be transparent.”

The policy Evans refers to is [__Rule 306A__](http://static.squarespace.com/static/5086f19ce4b0ad16ff15598d/t/52af5f62e4b0dbce9d22a83e/1387224930800/Rule+306A.pdf), which states in part: “While in uniform, sworn personnel shall wear their Department badges on the left breast of their outermost garment.”

Despite Evans’ assurances, fellow PINAC reporter Andrew Quemere and I caught numerous [__Boston police officers concealing their badges__](http://baystateexaminer.com/police-caught-hiding-their-badges-at-boston-protest/) and refusing to identify themselves at an Eric Garner rally in December. We even asked a deputy superintendent who was on scene about why so many police officers were concealing their badges, but he claimed that all the police there were wearing badges and then began ignoring us.

After we released video of the rally, a concerned citizen called into Boston Public Radio, which was again [__featuring Evans as its guest__](http://wgbhnews.org/post/boston-police-commissioner-we-dont-show-anymore-sticks-and-helmets), and questioned him about the officers’ behavior. Evans, who claimed to have watched the video, responded by making erroneous statements about it. He incorrectly claimed that his officers mostly reacted to our questions by putting their badges on and identifying themselves. He called his officers’ handling of our concerns “great” and doubled down on his claim that the Boston police always identify themselves properly.

This latest incident with Ridge is the second time in the last few months we have documented a member of the Boston police’s “command staff” failing to uphold department policy and the Massachusetts ID card law. Ridge’s participation in the misconduct and his escalation to intimidation encapsulate the failure of Evans’ leadership. If Evans hasn’t even gotten his command staff to follow extremely basic policies and laws the way he explains them to the media, he is either misleading the public or has lost control of his staff.

Boston police officers once again failed to wear their badges or identify themselves at a public event, but this time one of the 23 top ranking cops from the department’s “[__command staff__](http://bpdnews.com/news/2014/1/14/police-commissioner-william-evans-appoints-the-most-diverse-command-staff-in-the-history-of-the-boston-police-department)” was on hand to step in.

Sadly, when Deputy Superintendent William Ridge did involve himself in the incident, he joined in with his officers in their unlawful behavior and took it a step further by trying to intimidate me.

On July 4 in Massachusetts, Boston police deployed outside of the Esplanade area where Boston’s Independence Day celebration was being held. I was there to document the [__police checkpoints at the Esplanade__](http://baystateexaminer.com/independence-day-marred-by-police-state-checkpoints/) itself, but on my way I noticed four Boston police officers standing in a doorway.

Two of the rifle-toting cops were not displaying their badges, so I asked them to identify themselves as required by the [__Massachusetts police ID card law.__](https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleVII/Chapter41/Section98d) They refused.

I then asked all of the officers to comply with the state law that requires municipal police officers to carry and show a police ID upon lawful request. Three out of four of the officers refused and the fourth would only show his card to me off camera.

At the officer’s request, I turned off my camera and to his credit, he began to take out his ID card. But Ridge, who had been standing nearby, suddenly walked up to intervene, ordering the officer not to identify himself.

I resumed recording as Ridge refused to show his own ID card, ordered all of the officers not to identify themselves and then attempted to intimidate me by getting in my face and standing as close to me as possible without touching me.

Ridge ordered me to leave, even though I was standing on a public sidewalk and had the right to be there. I chose to walk away at that point because I did not want to be falsely arrested or injured.

This blatant attack on my First Amendment rights to record came only two months after the Boston police publicly apologized for a similar incident. Sergeant Henry Staines got in a man’s face, told him not to record an incident and flashed a realistic-looking toy gun at him to intimidate him. Boston Police Commissioner William Evans told the media that the Boston police would be retrained after [__the disturbing video__](http://baystateexaminer.com/boston-police-sergeant-apologizes-to-man-after-video-goes-viral/) went viral.

According to Evans, Boston police are not only aware that people have the right to record them while in public, they are also trained to always wear their badges and identify themselves to the public. After police in Ferguson were criticized for [__concealing their name tags__](http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2014/08/15/ferguson_police_nametags_reportedly_haven_t_been_worn.html), Evans told WGBH’s Boston Public Radio, “We have a clear policy that if anyone asks for our identity or our badge number, we clearly give it to them. We like to be transparent.”

The policy Evans refers to is [__Rule 306A__](http://static.squarespace.com/static/5086f19ce4b0ad16ff15598d/t/52af5f62e4b0dbce9d22a83e/1387224930800/Rule+306A.pdf), which states in part: “While in uniform, sworn personnel shall wear their Department badges on the left breast of their outermost garment.”

Despite Evans’ assurances, fellow PINAC reporter Andrew Quemere and I caught numerous [__Boston police officers concealing their badges__](http://baystateexaminer.com/police-caught-hiding-their-badges-at-boston-protest/) and refusing to identify themselves at an Eric Garner rally in December. We even asked a deputy superintendent who was on scene about why so many police officers were concealing their badges, but he claimed that all the police there were wearing badges and then began ignoring us.

After we released video of the rally, a concerned citizen called into Boston Public Radio, which was again [__featuring Evans as its guest__](http://wgbhnews.org/post/boston-police-commissioner-we-dont-show-anymore-sticks-and-helmets), and questioned him about the officers’ behavior. Evans, who claimed to have watched the video, responded by making erroneous statements about it. He incorrectly claimed that his officers mostly reacted to our questions by putting their badges on and identifying themselves. He called his officers’ handling of our concerns “great” and doubled down on his claim that the Boston police always identify themselves properly.

This latest incident with Ridge is the second time in the last few months we have documented a member of the Boston police’s “command staff” failing to uphold department policy and the Massachusetts ID card law. Ridge’s participation in the misconduct and his escalation to intimidation encapsulate the failure of Evans’ leadership. If Evans hasn’t even gotten his command staff to follow extremely basic policies and laws the way he explains them to the media, he is either misleading the public or has lost control of his staff.

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles