WATCH: Lawsuit Filed against Cops who Killed UPS Driver being held Hostage

​Without a shred of concern for public safety, cops from several South Florida law enforcement agencies opened fire on a UPS truck that had been hijacked by a pair of jewel thieves last year, killing the suspects and the UPS driver as well as another man sitting inside his car.

The shocking incident was live streamed to the world, showing more than a dozen cops hiding behind cars stuck in traffic as they fired more than 200 rounds towards the truck.

The cops, of course, claimed they all feared for their lives because the suspects fired at them as they tried to approach the truck on foot after it had gotten stuck in traffic.

But a lawsuit filed Monday representing the estate of UPS driver Frank Ordonez Jr. claims officers from six law enforcement agencies did everything wrong that day. And judging by the outrage on social media following the shooting, that happens to be a widespread opinion.

Named in the lawsuit is the Miami-Dade Police Department, the Miramar Police Department, the Doral Police Department, the Pembroke Pines Police Department, the Broward Sheriff’s Office and the Florida Highway.

The main agency involved in the chase was the Miami-Dade Police Department. The Broward Sheriff’s Office issued a statement claiming it was not involved in the shooting.

The lawsuit listed the following examples of how the cops were negligent that day.

a. failing to stop the truck in an area that was not populated by civilians;

b. failing to corral, direct, or otherwise lead the truck away from civilian traffic;

c. failing to evacuate the Miramar Parkway;

d. failing negotiate with the robbers, in an effort to avoid the use of force;

e. failing to communicate with other law enforcement agencies in order to develop and execute a collaborative means of addressing the hostage scenario;

f. failing to allow civilian traffic on the Miramar Parkway from continuing to drive, thereby isolating the truck;

g. incorrectly creating a blockage on the Miramar Parkway, causing the truck to be stopped among civilian vehicles;

h. failing to follow standard police procedures and practices for conducting a vehicular pursuit;

i. incorrectly discharging firearms upon the truck, knowing that civilian cars were around;

j. failing to respond reasonably to gunfire, given that FRANK ORDONEZ was still alive;

k. failing to identify, and specifically locate a target before discharging a firearm;

l. failing to keep distance from the truck in order to decrease tensions;

m. allowing tactics to be implemented that resulted in the escalation of a potentially volatile situation;

n. failing to intervene while officers were aware that fellow law enforcement officers were acting unreasonably;

o. dangerously using vehicles occupied by civilians as shield and/or barricades during a shootout;

p. failing to provide specific aid to civilians trapped in the midst of a shootout;

q. additional acts of negligence not yet discovered.

Read the lawsuit here. Watch the video below.

​Without a shred of concern for public safety, cops from several South Florida law enforcement agencies opened fire on a UPS truck that had been hijacked by a pair of jewel thieves last year, killing the suspects and the UPS driver as well as another man sitting inside his car.

The shocking incident was live streamed to the world, showing more than a dozen cops hiding behind cars stuck in traffic as they fired more than 200 rounds towards the truck.

The cops, of course, claimed they all feared for their lives because the suspects fired at them as they tried to approach the truck on foot after it had gotten stuck in traffic.

But a lawsuit filed Monday representing the estate of UPS driver Frank Ordonez Jr. claims officers from six law enforcement agencies did everything wrong that day. And judging by the outrage on social media following the shooting, that happens to be a widespread opinion.

Named in the lawsuit is the Miami-Dade Police Department, the Miramar Police Department, the Doral Police Department, the Pembroke Pines Police Department, the Broward Sheriff’s Office and the Florida Highway.

The main agency involved in the chase was the Miami-Dade Police Department. The Broward Sheriff’s Office issued a statement claiming it was not involved in the shooting.

The lawsuit listed the following examples of how the cops were negligent that day.

a. failing to stop the truck in an area that was not populated by civilians;

b. failing to corral, direct, or otherwise lead the truck away from civilian traffic;

c. failing to evacuate the Miramar Parkway;

d. failing negotiate with the robbers, in an effort to avoid the use of force;

e. failing to communicate with other law enforcement agencies in order to develop and execute a collaborative means of addressing the hostage scenario;

f. failing to allow civilian traffic on the Miramar Parkway from continuing to drive, thereby isolating the truck;

g. incorrectly creating a blockage on the Miramar Parkway, causing the truck to be stopped among civilian vehicles;

h. failing to follow standard police procedures and practices for conducting a vehicular pursuit;

i. incorrectly discharging firearms upon the truck, knowing that civilian cars were around;

j. failing to respond reasonably to gunfire, given that FRANK ORDONEZ was still alive;

k. failing to identify, and specifically locate a target before discharging a firearm;

l. failing to keep distance from the truck in order to decrease tensions;

m. allowing tactics to be implemented that resulted in the escalation of a potentially volatile situation;

n. failing to intervene while officers were aware that fellow law enforcement officers were acting unreasonably;

o. dangerously using vehicles occupied by civilians as shield and/or barricades during a shootout;

p. failing to provide specific aid to civilians trapped in the midst of a shootout;

q. additional acts of negligence not yet discovered.

Read the lawsuit here. Watch the video below.

- Advertisement -

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Miller
Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles