Homeland Security and FBI Release Document Once Again Labeling

In a newly released document from the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI.

The[ “Roll Call Release,”](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/DHS-FBI-Photography-3.pdf “ “Roll Call Release,””) dated November 13, 2012 and titled “Suspicious Activity Reporting: Photography,” gives a vague reference to a single example where a terrorist may have used cameras to plan attacks.

> “In late 2000 and early 2001, convicted al-Qaida operative Dhiren Barot took extensive video footage and numerous photographs of sites in downtown New York City and Washington DC in preparation for planned attacks.”

But then it goes on to list three other examples where people were detained for using cameras in airports, parking garages and shopping malls – which the report describes as “consistent with pre-operational activity and attack planning” – that turned out to have nothing to do with terrorist activity.

But the feds still refer to these detainments as a sign of success because they served for “awareness and training purposes” – as if they need any more training to harass innocent photographers.

And although Barot [was convicted of planning attacks](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/terrorism.uk “was convicted of planning attacks”), authorities could not connect a video he recorded of the World Trade Center to the actual 9/11 terrorist attacks.

> Barot undertook reconnaissance missions in the UK and US in 2000 and 2001, during which he filmed buildings including the International Monetary Fund and World Bank headquarters in Washington DC and the Stock Exchange and Citigroup buildings in New York.

> Although there was no evidence that he had foreknowledge of the September 11 attacks on the US, one clip, played in court, showed the World Trade Centre with someone imitating the noise of an explosion in the background.

Barot was also known to visit public libraries to plan possible attacks, so perhaps visiting your local library will soon be regarded as suspicious.

Labeling photographers as potential terrorists has been rampant since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but in 2010, after forcing a man to the ground for video recording a federal courthouse in New York City, the Department of Homeland Security agreed to a settlement, [acknowledging that photographing](http://www.photographyisnotacrime.com/feds-agree-to-settlement-that-photography-of-public-buildings-is-legal/ “acknowledging that photographing”) federal buildings is not a crime.

But that still didn’t stop the feds for spreading the message that photographers should be deemed suspicious, including [funding municipalities](http://www.pixiq.com/article/houston-propaganda-video-depicts-photographers-as-terrorists “funding municipalities”) to produce propaganda videos.

Two months ago, it began [encouraging citizens](http://www.photographyisnotacrime.com/houston-propaganda-video-depicts-photographers-as-terrorists/ “encouraging citizens”) to photograph other citizens who take suspicious photographs in order to report them to Homeland Security.

In October, the [FBI visited](http://www.photographyisnotacrime.com/houston-man-receives-visit-from-fbi-after-photographing-weather/ “FBI visited”) a Houston man at home after he had been seen taking photos near a refinery. He had only been taking pictures of a brewing storm for the National Weather Service.

In 2008, security expert Bruce Schneier wrote his famous [“War on Photography”](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/the_war_on_phot.html ““War on Photography””) article, in which he stated the following:

> Since 9/11, there has been an increasing war on photography. Photographers have been harassed, questioned, detained, arrested or worse, and declared to be unwelcome. We’ve been repeatedly told to watch out for photographers, especially suspicious ones. Clearly any terrorist is going to first photograph his target, so vigilance is required.

> Except that it’s nonsense. The 9/11 terrorists didn’t photograph anything. Nor did the London transport bombers, the Madrid subway bombers, or the liquid bombers arrested in 2006. Timothy McVeigh didn’t photograph the Oklahoma City Federal Building. The Unabomber didn’t photograph anything; neither did shoe-bomber Richard Reid. Photographs aren’t being found amongst the papers of Palestinian suicide bombers. The IRA wasn’t known for its photography. Even those manufactured terrorist plots that the US government likes to talk about — the Ft. Dix terrorists, the JFK airport bombers, the Miami 7, the Lackawanna 6 — no photography.

Thanks to [Massachusetts Private Eye](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/massprivatei.blogspot.com “Massachusetts Private Eye”) for the heads up on this story, who found it on an interesting site called [Public Intelligence](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/dhs-fbi-photography “Public Intelligence”) that collects these types of documents, including one from February 2011 where a man was detained in Seattle for [“suspicious iPhone photography.”](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/seattle-shield-program-suspicious-activity-report-iphone-photography ““suspicious iPhone photography.””)

*To email writer,* [*click here.*](mailto:carlosmiller@magiccitymedia.com “click here.”)

*Or to send a donation to help maintain Photography is Not a Crime,* [*click here.*](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/webscr?cmd=_flow&SESSION=lqM6iz8qbK7eVHx7vYmh510sGQ7ub9ln67iiV2bpkf9FwwW4mrBl6b5OAaO&dispatch=5885d80a13c0db1f8e263663d3faee8d0b7e678a25d883d0fa72c947f193f8fd6 “click here.”)

In a newly released document from the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI.

The[ “Roll Call Release,”](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/DHS-FBI-Photography-3.pdf “ “Roll Call Release,””) dated November 13, 2012 and titled “Suspicious Activity Reporting: Photography,” gives a vague reference to a single example where a terrorist may have used cameras to plan attacks.

> “In late 2000 and early 2001, convicted al-Qaida operative Dhiren Barot took extensive video footage and numerous photographs of sites in downtown New York City and Washington DC in preparation for planned attacks.”

But then it goes on to list three other examples where people were detained for using cameras in airports, parking garages and shopping malls – which the report describes as “consistent with pre-operational activity and attack planning” – that turned out to have nothing to do with terrorist activity.

But the feds still refer to these detainments as a sign of success because they served for “awareness and training purposes” – as if they need any more training to harass innocent photographers.

And although Barot [was convicted of planning attacks](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/terrorism.uk “was convicted of planning attacks”), authorities could not connect a video he recorded of the World Trade Center to the actual 9/11 terrorist attacks.

> Barot undertook reconnaissance missions in the UK and US in 2000 and 2001, during which he filmed buildings including the International Monetary Fund and World Bank headquarters in Washington DC and the Stock Exchange and Citigroup buildings in New York.

> Although there was no evidence that he had foreknowledge of the September 11 attacks on the US, one clip, played in court, showed the World Trade Centre with someone imitating the noise of an explosion in the background.

Barot was also known to visit public libraries to plan possible attacks, so perhaps visiting your local library will soon be regarded as suspicious.

Labeling photographers as potential terrorists has been rampant since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but in 2010, after forcing a man to the ground for video recording a federal courthouse in New York City, the Department of Homeland Security agreed to a settlement, [acknowledging that photographing](http://www.photographyisnotacrime.com/feds-agree-to-settlement-that-photography-of-public-buildings-is-legal/ “acknowledging that photographing”) federal buildings is not a crime.

But that still didn’t stop the feds for spreading the message that photographers should be deemed suspicious, including [funding municipalities](http://www.pixiq.com/article/houston-propaganda-video-depicts-photographers-as-terrorists “funding municipalities”) to produce propaganda videos.

Two months ago, it began [encouraging citizens](http://www.photographyisnotacrime.com/houston-propaganda-video-depicts-photographers-as-terrorists/ “encouraging citizens”) to photograph other citizens who take suspicious photographs in order to report them to Homeland Security.

In October, the [FBI visited](http://www.photographyisnotacrime.com/houston-man-receives-visit-from-fbi-after-photographing-weather/ “FBI visited”) a Houston man at home after he had been seen taking photos near a refinery. He had only been taking pictures of a brewing storm for the National Weather Service.

In 2008, security expert Bruce Schneier wrote his famous [“War on Photography”](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/the_war_on_phot.html ““War on Photography””) article, in which he stated the following:

> Since 9/11, there has been an increasing war on photography. Photographers have been harassed, questioned, detained, arrested or worse, and declared to be unwelcome. We’ve been repeatedly told to watch out for photographers, especially suspicious ones. Clearly any terrorist is going to first photograph his target, so vigilance is required.

> Except that it’s nonsense. The 9/11 terrorists didn’t photograph anything. Nor did the London transport bombers, the Madrid subway bombers, or the liquid bombers arrested in 2006. Timothy McVeigh didn’t photograph the Oklahoma City Federal Building. The Unabomber didn’t photograph anything; neither did shoe-bomber Richard Reid. Photographs aren’t being found amongst the papers of Palestinian suicide bombers. The IRA wasn’t known for its photography. Even those manufactured terrorist plots that the US government likes to talk about — the Ft. Dix terrorists, the JFK airport bombers, the Miami 7, the Lackawanna 6 — no photography.

Thanks to [Massachusetts Private Eye](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/massprivatei.blogspot.com “Massachusetts Private Eye”) for the heads up on this story, who found it on an interesting site called [Public Intelligence](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/dhs-fbi-photography “Public Intelligence”) that collects these types of documents, including one from February 2011 where a man was detained in Seattle for [“suspicious iPhone photography.”](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/seattle-shield-program-suspicious-activity-report-iphone-photography ““suspicious iPhone photography.””)

*To email writer,* [*click here.*](mailto:carlosmiller@magiccitymedia.com “click here.”)

*Or to send a donation to help maintain Photography is Not a Crime,* [*click here.*](http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/webscr?cmd=_flow&SESSION=lqM6iz8qbK7eVHx7vYmh510sGQ7ub9ln67iiV2bpkf9FwwW4mrBl6b5OAaO&dispatch=5885d80a13c0db1f8e263663d3faee8d0b7e678a25d883d0fa72c947f193f8fd6 “click here.”)

Support our Mission

Help us build a database of bad cops

For almost 15 years, PINAC News has remained active despite continuous efforts by the government and Big Tech to shut us down by either arresting us for lawful activity or by restricting access to our readers under the pretense that we write about “social issues.”

Since we are forbidden from discussing social issues on social media, we have created forums on our site to allow us to fulfill our mission with as little restriction as possible. We welcome our readers to join our forums and support our mission by either donating, volunteering or both.

Our plan is to build a national database of bad cops obtained from public records maintained by local prosecutors. The goal is to teach our readers how to obtain these lists to ensure we cover every city, county and state in the country.

After all, the government has made it clear it will not police the police so the role falls upon us.

It will be our most ambitious project yet but it can only be done with your help.

But if we succeed, we will be able to keep innocent people out of prison.

Please make a donation below or click on side tab to learn more about our mission.

Subscribe to PINAC

Bypass Big Tech censorship.

Carlos Millerhttps://pinacnews.com
Editor-in-Chief Carlos Miller spent a decade covering the cop beat for various newspapers in the Southwest before returning to his hometown Miami and launching Photography is Not a Crime aka PINAC News in 2007. He also published a book, The Citizen Journalist's Photography Handbook, which is available on Amazon.

Leave a Reply

- Advertisement -

Latest articles